What is the difference between the behavior of Britain and what Obama is doing..?

What is the difference between the behavior of Britain and what Obama is doing..?

obama smirkingEngland and America did not begin an overt parting of the ways until 1763, more than a century and a half after the founding of the first permanent settlement at Jamestown, Virginia. The colonies had grown vastly in economic strength and cultural attainment, and virtually all had long years of self-government behind them. In the 1760s their combined population exceeded 1,500,000 — a six fold increase since 1700.
In the aftermath of the French and Indian War, Britain needed a new imperial design, but the situation in America was anything but favorable to change. Long accustomed to a large measure of independence, the colonies were demanding more, not less, freedom, particularly now that the French menace had been eliminated.

The British government, fearing that settlers migrating into the new lands would provoke a series of Indian wars, believed that the lands should be opened to colonists on a more gradual basis. Restricting movement was also a way of ensuring royal control over existing settlements before allowing the formation of new ones.

The Royal Proclamation of 1763 reserved all the western territory between the Alleghenies, Florida, the Mississippi River and Quebec for use by Native Americans. Thus the Crown attempted to sweep away every western land claim of the 13 colonies and to stop westward expansion.

More serious in its repercussions was the new financial policy of the British government, which needed more money to

So many Questions

So many Questions

support its growing empire. Unless the taxpayer in England was to supply all money for the colonies’ defense, revenues would have to be extracted from the colonists through a stronger central administration, which would come at the expense of colonial self-government.

The first step in inaugurating the new system was the replacement of the Molasses Act of 1733, which placed a prohibitive duty, or tax, on the import of rum and molasses from non-English areas, with the Sugar Act of 1764. This act forbade the importation of foreign rum; put a modest duty on molasses from all sources and levied duties on wines, silks, coffee and a number of other luxury items.

Both the duty imposed by the Sugar Act and the measures to enforce it caused consternation among New England merchants. They contended that payment of even the small duty imposed would be ruinous to their businesses. Merchants, legislatures and town meetings protested the law, and colonial lawyers found in the preamble of the Sugar Act the first intimation of “taxation without representation,” the slogan that was to draw many to the American cause against the mother country.

The last of the measures inaugurating the new colonial system sparked the greatest organized resistance. Known as the “Stamp Act,” it provided that revenue stamps be affixed to all newspapers, broadsides, pamphlets, licenses, leases or other legal documents, the revenue (collected by American customs agents) to be used for “defending, protecting and securing” the colonies.

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest confirmed Monday that President Obama is “very interested” in the idea of raising taxes through unilateral executive action. “The president certainly has not indicated any reticence in using his executive authority to try and advance an agenda that benefits middle class Americans,” Earnest said in response to a question about Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) calling on Obama to raise more than $100 billion in taxes through IRS executive action. “Now I don’t want to leave you with the impression that there is some imminent announcement, there is not, at least that I know of,” Earnest continued. “But the president has asked his team to examine the array of executive authorities that are available to him to try to make progress on his goals…”

Taxation without representation started the American revolution that founded this country on principles designed to ensure that would not happen again. Tyranny must be resisted – then and now. Today March 3, 2015 has been a day of: “We have a history here — with certain injurious events vowed never to happen again. One, of course was the American revolution; two, an activity similar to Vietnam; Three, the USA’s allied support during a time of war for Israel; four, The Holocaust; five, human bondage and slavery. Yet as I sit here and type I am motivated to shout — How much further would you like us to bend, Mr. President? These vary issues are indeed happening again!

This individual has gone from clown to outright dictator. In more ways than we know this tyrannical fool has imposed his will on Americans — this is not news! What Barack Obama is doing is unconscionable! Where are the voices we voted into office last mid-term election. Moreover, where is your voice.

quote_bottom-e1358301882938

Posted in Abuse of Power, Amnesty, Congress, Corruption, Family, taxation | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What about Net Neutrality?

What about Net Neutrality?

PS - net neutralityThe telecom industry on Thursday slammed the The Federal Communications Commission’s adoption of sweeping new Internet regulations, warning that the rules are a “radical step” that spells bad news for consumers and the economy.

Following a contentious meeting, the commission voted 3-2 to adopt its so-called net neutrality plan. The new regulations, which aim to bar service providers from creating paid Internet “fast lanes,” were sought by President Obama. FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said that the plan would ensure an “open, unfettered network.”

However, major telecom industry players were scathing in their reaction to the vote, which looks set to be challenged in the courts.

“FCC’s ‘Throwback Thursday’ Move Imposes 1930s Rules on the Internet,” wrote Verizon, in a blog post. To illustrate its point, the company wrote its statement in Morse code, but added a link to a translated version for “readers in the 21st century.”

“By ignoring the fundamental differences in wireless networks and disregarding the intense competition throughout the mobile ecosystem, the FCC abandoned a long-standing policy framework responsible for fostering America’s world-leading wireless industry.”

“The agency’s action runs counter to an express Congressional directive prohibiting the agency from treating mobile broadband like a utility service, making today’s decision not only unwise, but unlawful,” it said. “The economic and legal uncertainty that will inevitably follow from the FCC’s unilateral action underscores the importance of, and urgent need for, bipartisan Congressional action that can end the net neutrality debate and allow our country’s mobile ecosystem to focus on what it does best – innovating, investing and empowering Americans’ mobile connected lives.”

The new rules would put the Internet in the same regulatory camp as the telephone by classifying it like a public utility.

Net neutrality is the idea that websites or videos load at about the same speed. That means you won’t be more inclined to watch a particular show on Amazon Prime instead of on Netflix because Amazon has struck a deal with your service provider to load its data faster.

For years, providers mostly agreed not to pick winners and losers among Web traffic because they didn’t want to encourage regulators to step in and because they said consumers demanded it. But that started to change around 2005, when YouTube came online and Netflix became increasingly popular. On-demand video began hogging bandwidth, and evidence surfaced that some providers were manipulating traffic without telling consumers.

By 2010, the FCC enacted open Internet rules, but the agency’s legal approach was eventually struck down in the courts. The vote Thursday was intended by Wheeler to erase any legal ambiguity by no longer classifying the Internet as an “information service” but a “telecommunications service” subject Title II of the 1934 Communications Act.

That would dramatically expand regulators’ power over the industry and hold broadband providers to the higher standard of operating in the public interest.

“We are confident that Title II regulation will be rejected as Congress, the courts and consumers fully understand how it will hold back investment, innovation and growth,” the TIA added. “While we support the coming legal challenges, our plan is to work with Congress to find a reasonable, balanced approach to an open Internet.”

Some observations and perceptions: We have seen, in this country, how changes in a federal agency whilst then applying 2012-01-25 19.16.02dusty old federal “Acts” to them can upend a Nation (see anything on Immigration Reform). The other open perception made is that it is the federal “central” government getting involved; moreover, knowing that Barack Obama endorses this proposal is not justified or healthy.*
* Is your authors way of crediting Fox News with participating in this article.

quote_top

Posted in Congress, FCC, Internet Neutrality | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

House Speaker John Boehner has cut a deal to pass a long-term funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security

Has Rep. Boehner cut a deal..?

Boehner_lameMultiple reports that House Speaker John Boehner has cut a deal to pass a long-term funding bill for the Department of Homeland Security without ties to rolling back President Obama’s executive action on immigration has reignited rumblings about a Boehner coup.

The deal was purportedly struck as the House agreed late Friday night to fund the agency for seven days to avoid a partial shutdown.

At least one congressional aide said the deal between Boehner and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi was to get enough Democratic votes in the Republican-led chamber to avoid the shutdown at midnight Friday, in exchange for Boehner’s promise to allow a vote next week on a long-term funding bill “clean” of the immigration issue.

Well as far as The Contemplative Thinker is concerned any notion of long-term funding, is one battle that the Republican Party needs to muscle up and remember for those who intend on voting “yea” on a “clean” bill without recourse or retribution planned for in advance, I could agree with some of these aides going around.

Furthermore, as far as immigration is concerned we were under the impression that the entire Immigration system is in need of planning, reorganizing, and making very sure that their concern is on — REFORMATION — in the trustiest sense of the word.

cyb3008It does concern us the way these “Gang of Eight (8)” members who also have appreciation for one day working out of the Oval Office is not only comical but for the love of God, didn’t these backsliding foolish people think that their positions then were going to affect them now?

Boehner spokesman Mike Steel told Fox News that such a deal doesn’t exist. Pelosi’s office has neither confirmed nor denied such a deal.

If there was any one piece of evidence or talking point that I would issue and/or deliver to Rep. Boehner, it would read about the various cautions in dealing with mentally incompetent people. Sure that is what appears to be their work taking on the likes of Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the rest of the Washington basement who pass legislation without even having it printed. And they are all guilty — of some sort of collusion and unethical business of that sort think: ObamaCare!

The calls for Boehner’s ouster appear to be coming mostly from the 50-plus, most-conservative members who formed

What have YOU accomplished?

What have YOU accomplished?

the new Freedom Caucus. And they appear to be growing more restless.

My fellow conservative gentle people who have tried with some degree of success to keep many of America’s ways truly conservative we are addressing you now. Now is not the time for distemper or any other disease that would cause anxiety or suffrage.

It is during times such as these that we are experiencing now that the coolest minds prevail. Take whatever mental energy you have at this point and press on to the day when the likes of Obama is reeling. The guy has shown me in more ways than one, that he recklessly disregards capitalism, behaves in a socialist environment, and at least this much I know:

That if it had not been for some of you folks we would be chanting Marxist slogans. Please do not misunderstand me; this guy does nothing by the book! He does not follow or respect our Constitution our tradition or our way of life. Seriously, why argue with a point that this man is not corrupt, scheming, and without question is doing something with the very ammo for our guns.

Keep a clean and clear critical thinking mind. The guy is ready to go down. In association with   2012-01-25 19.16.02

quote_top

Posted in Amnesty, Christianity, Civil Rights, Congress, Family | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Special Envoy for LGBT set up at State Department

Special Envoy for LGBT set up at State department

635587280621826723-AP-Obama-Prayer-Breakfast_1The first-ever special envoy for LGBT rights, a position created to advance the Obama administration’s efforts to eliminate violence and discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people around the world, will be honored Friday at the State Department.

Randy Berry, who was named to the position, is a Foreign Service officer based in the Netherlands and is openly gay and married to another man.

 “Defending and promoting the human rights of LGBT persons is at the core of our commitment to advancing human rights globally – the heart and conscience of our diplomacy,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in a statement. “That’s why we’re working to overturn laws that criminalize consensual same-sex conduct in countries around the world.”

 This perspective brings Obama, the Department of State, and the entire United States into the forefront; however, at the same time we at The Contemplative Thinker, remain in wonder why — yes WHY — this clamoring for a special envoy is necessary; moreover, committing “paid for” violence and discrimination against the LGBT communities in Africa. 

This is a classic example of how the cultural changes embodied in the Western culture have a way of really messing things up. Let’s look at Secretary of State John Kerry’s statement. As far as leadership is concerned this is a misstatement above all. “That’s why we’re working to overturn laws that criminalize consensual same-sex conduct in countries around the world.” As for us this is preposterous!

 First, what gives the leadership in the U.S. the right to overturn anything in any other nations social, political, or World Sailing Mapbehavioral order? Seriously Barack Obama has made more mistakes during his terms in office than any other president could imagine. So seeing that his approval ratings are slumping he begins to do something to assist an issue that we have problems with in our own nation.

 Secondly, we find what is happening around the globe to Coptic Christians — murdering, kids included, all facets of society by a different religious entity — Islam with absolutely nothing being done in any attempted effort to stop or dissuade the genocide occurring by this group.

 Thirdly, where is the “advancement of human rights globally – the heart and conscience of our diplomacy,” found within our nation’s First Amendment rights? This again shows how Americas leadership is doing whatever it can — right or wrong — to involve itself in other worldly matters, rather than concentrating on Americas domestic issues or foreign affairs that have precedence over this behavior.

Posted in Abuse of Power, Amnesty, Assessment, Christianity, Corruption, Current Events, Equal Rights | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Has our President Lost His Mind..?

Has our President Lost His Mind..?

white house We have discussed the notion of the Usurpation of Politics — What we are addressing in our (lay) terms is the President of the United States (POTUS) seizing something without rights, in order to control or monitor the behavior of us — We the People. How many times (see archive for previous articles) have you seen on this blog, “STOP! legislating from the bench, or the Oval Office.” This complexity usually happens to me when regardless of the law of the land — US Constitution — the POTUS in this case to make policy that directly interferes with what right we used to have, and that according to some advisor we no longer have that right even though it has been duly legislated by our nation’s Legislature.

Why has Barack Obama, decided so early in his first term to cut the Congress out of debate; moreover, President Obama is now directing not asking the American people, “So how about at least 5 million individuals to be amnestied because I want my name to go into history as the guy who said, ‘hey it is okay.'”

Well we already have this man caught up in so many fabrications who would even want to believe him? Proof is in the details, gang. The POTUS does not possess the innuendo to grant something that he just wants to do! When the Framer’s set up the Republican Democracy it was clearly stated that it is Congress’ job of doing anything to the immigration plans of our Nation.

As you can easily see President Obama is deluding — or leading into a false belief — that he has the power to do so. CYB3007The America where I was born and raised, the same America that I volunteered to serve as with my life, as did my ancestors did in the Revolutionary War would laugh at the deluding and power hungry person who does not even ask for their public opinion.

Now if you believe there is something amiss in this article I need to ask everyone what does the following do for you?

 OBAMA’S AMNESTY SPENDING MAY DEFY JUDGE’S INJUNCTION, FEDERAL ANTIDEFICIENCE ACT

On Tuesday President Obama announced the Department of Homeland Security would not process executive amnesty applications, and hand out related work permits, in light of the Feb. 16 injunction by Judge Andrew Hanen. He will, however, continue to spend funds in preparation for implementation, which appears to violate Judge Hanen’s injunction, according to The Daily Caller. The watchdog group Judicial Watch last week asked Congress to investigate whether the president violated the federal Antideficiency Act by spending funds he did not have in preparation for launching his executive amnesty.

But The Daily Caller reports Judge Hanen’s injunction bars all DHS preparations. It says Administration officials “are hereby enjoined from implementing any and all aspects or phases of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (‘DAP A’) program as set out in the Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson’s memorandum dated November 20.”

The media reported Obama’s claim about complying with the judge’s order but did not question whether continuing amnesty preparations was in fact consistent with that order. Questions also have been raised as to whether spending-to-date on Obama’s executive amnesties has been lawful.

Judicial Watch last week asked Congress to initiate a Government Accountability Office investigation into whether the Administration has unlawfully redirected DHS funds to pay for executive amnesty preparations. The Administration leased an office building in Virginia to house 1,000 new hires who will process amnesty applications, The combined cost for leasing and staff is an estimated $48 million. Plus on Jan. 23rd DHS solicited bids for “records support services in support of deferred action for parents of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents.”

The very fact that Judge Hanen has found that the 26 states’ have standing on this issue means the legality of the president’s executive amnesty is seriously in doubt. This should simply serve to reinforce that Congress, and not the executive, has precedence over immigration policy. President Obama has acted unilaterally on this issue and taken steps he said time and again he didn’t have the legal authority to do so.

quote_bottom-e1358301882938

Posted in Abuse of Power, American History, Amnesty, Costs of Illegal Immigration, Usurpation | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama’s Reflux on Federal Court Ruling

ICE Can’t Fill Detention Quotas for Illegal Aliens Due to Pres. Obama’s Policies

ICE1282014_0Reports from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) show that they have not been able to fill the 34,000 detention beds with illegal aliens as the law requires. The department, which serves as the interior enforcement and deportation arm of the Department of Homeland Security, was averaging just 27,000 detainees a day for fiscal 2015 as of Jan. 25. That means that over 20% of ICE’s capacity is going unused thus far.

 

continue

 

Sen. McConnell Announces Plan to Fund Obama’s Amnesty’s

mcconnell022515Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced a plan on Tuesday that would allow a vote on a “clean” DHS funding bill that would fully fund Pres. Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty’s he plans hinges on a possible deal with Senate Democrats that would require them to allow debate on a separate measure that would defund the president’s 2014 executive amnesty’s. The move came a day after Senate Democrats, along with Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.), blocked debate on the House-passed DHS funding bill, H.R.240.

 

continue

 

Sen. Jeff Sessions Speaks Out Against 2013 Amnesty Framework

On January 28, 2013, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) responded to an immigration reform proposal from a “Gang of Eight” that includes Senators Chuck Schumer, Dick Durbin, Bob Menendez, Michael Bennet, Marco Rubio, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Jeff Flake.

continue A must see video, enjoy!

 

 

Members of Congress Applaud Temporary Injunction to Block Executive Amnesty

sealUnited States District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled late Monday night to temporarily block certain executive actions President Obama took late last year that would grant amnesty and work permits to an estimated 5 million illegal aliens. In the wake of the ruling, several Members of Congress have issued statements applauding the injunction and doubling down on their commitment to pass a DHS spending bill that blocks funding for President Obama’s executive amnesties.

So folks continuing on within the political correctness that we have reached thus far I ask for volunteers on this one: How did after 1986 and President Reagan’s amnesty, which at that time freed up approximately 3.4 million illegal immigrants, notwithstanding those who for some reason or another did not register with USCIS which is approximately 600,000 individuals suddenly turn into 12 million that are now here – just a breath away from being granted amnesty?

Remember how we started this entire political correctness enigma – a mere changing of native language; having some trouble grasping that…no problem: Once upon a time America entered into political arrangements with Mexico, some Middle American nations, whereby it would benefit both governments if we could initiate a “Guest or Seasonal Worker” program. Now with the influx of illegal immigrants as well as refugees from Somalia, Kenya, Asia, Russia, as well as students from all of the Middle East to 12 or more million people – these individuals remained because their monickor had changed  and encouraged by the federal government to Undocumented immigrants, Exiles, Who No Fault of their Own, that morphed into Profiling, Racial Profiling, into “An Urgent Humanitarian Crisis” and all the while our judicial system prided itself on the Usurpation of Politics by adhering to laws that have been made and/or altered by the very judicial system.

quote_top

Posted in Abuse of Power, American History, Amnesty, Catalina Island, Costs of Illegal Immigration | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How much Barack Obama can you tear up our language?

419105_10151238154313092_1906501386_nAt the White House Summit on Extremism That Shall Remain Unspecified Because Violent Followers Belonging To Unnamed Extremist Movement Might Take Extreme Offense And Act Extremely, the feds are touting a groundbreaking new strategy to fight terrorists. And if this one hasn’t done it for you, then we’ve got so much more.

Actually the aforementioned Summit that Shall Remain Unspecified is something not done because the Summit has already been named. Oh contraire! Literally the ideology of these very people do not have any agenda whatsoever ― actually have arrived always ready to be heard on anything. Goodness gracious already! These are the exact same people who did not do a lick of research on a man who willfully changed his name to Barry Sotero and still does not have a valid social security number. It gets worse — it is these walking talking empty heads that voted him in not once no way — but twice! And just a little tender loving listening (reading), it will be these exact same people who will vote Hillary Clinton as the Democrat nominee.

How about the President of the United States being unable to mention “Islamic militants, Muslim jihadists’, or even Islamic Freedom Fighters” into a coherent sentence. As for us at The Contemplative Thinker, Barack Obama is just about the most noticeable official PC’er. He is precisely the type of human being who always has something different to call (language remember!) a something one thing and then later, however frisky he is feeling (primarily based on his ratings) — he will call that something one thing, all together a completely different identifier. Here is a good example:

No less than 22 times did Barack Obama say he would not do an “executive plan” to grant illegal aliens in our nation to grant amnesty which as you and I both know will cause the entitlement — welfare system to be over spent simply adding to a budget that is so far gone…it is history. Understanding how a culture changes some of its ways is to look upon the moral, ethical, and values based traditions that existed before America was called America.

All one need do is basic critical thinking with emphasis on what morals used to be that since have changed. We have a 130px-No_Political_Correctnesssituation in this nation a real renouncement of ethical behavior. Rather than go the hedonistic route with you, just think about Usurpation and what our embattled judicial system now codifies as ethics. Where and what happened to our values? It used to be that the President followed the U.S. Constitution.

Moving natural matters into a politically correct domain sometimes takes years, decades, or even generations; then with other issues it seems like days, weeks, maybe even months. One matter that comes to mind immediately is that Section 287 (g) whereby Immigration and Customs Enforcement was training with local police on the proper way to arrest and/or detain illegal immigrants. Section 287 (g) works both ways — it must also equivocate what ICE does and train the local police, it is very similar to a combined law enforcement which is something that is very much needed in America. Basically what we are explaining is how two different agencies combine their work loads and viola! Each agency does half of their original work; in all common sense when special interest groups want something they get it.

Political+Correctness3But no matter how hard and loud the screaming got, the diplomatic folks in Washington decided to pull the plug on the entire works. So then what have you got? Quite openly you have legislated an agency of the federal government (ICE) to do as the local police have every right to do — which included padding someone down if there was a probable cause to do so. Therefore, once the fed could not do it, then why not make that a restriction on the local police?

And that is precisely what happened — the local police and the agents of the federal government were no longer able to work together and just GUESS what those doing the shotty job of undermining the rights that an officer once had called this action: Profiling with emphasis on Racial profiling. That entire mess of changing legislation that benefitted both parties was no longer useable because of what was considered racial profiling. More to come for the future.

quote_bottom-e1358301882938

Posted in Corruption, Costs of Illegal Immigration, Current Events, Native Language, Political Correctness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Political Correctness seen from Around the World

Political Correctness

We believe that the process America is in — that process of always trying to be politically correct — has a way of damaging everything that it possibly can…and unfortunately it does. Our attempt to solidify political correctness, shown examples of how being “P.C.” has lead to our understanding of what it is, and lastly we have tried to have groups of people start talking about it during their own leisure times.
First and foremost there is not a clear way to convey or say everything that needs to be stated about the dreadful causes behind being politically correct. However, if there is something that all of the liberals choose to attack and it is without doubt, the native language of that culture.

No matter which way you flip a coin and it doesn’t matter which side the coin lands on, if one flipped a dollar coin, that coin will forever be a dollar coin. It may not always be worth a dollar in value, however, as a coin it will always be a dollar. Funny thing about language in that way – as we humans continue to stigmatize language.

How does humankind stigmatize language? The best attempt we’ve ever seen has to do with the notion that language isn’t always constant. Furthermore, we believe that there is a big, huge problem with this notion in practice. Most of academia will state that even dictionaries are after-the-fact insofar as the time it takes to put a dictionary together and published, then they argue that too much time has gone by for the words to mean the same prior to the publication of the dictionary.

This summation is awkward at best; yet, when one figures that only two or three words are added each year there would have to be far more taken out for academia’s notion to be remotely correct.

By the end of the 1960s upwards of the late 1970s the New Left, a term associated with activists, educators, and agitators either on the college campuses and involved with hippie-dom and others who sought to implement a broad range of reforms, in contrast to earlier leftist or Marxist movements that had taken a more ‘vanguardian’ approach to social justice and focused mostly on labor unionization and questions of social class had adopted the term political correctness.

In the essay The Black Woman, Toni Cade Bambara says: “. . . a man cannot be politically correct and a [male] chauvinist too”. The New Left later re-appropriated the term political correctness as satirical self-criticism; per Debra Shultz: “Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, the New Left, feminists, and progressives . . . used their term politically correct ironically, as a guard against their own orthodoxy in social change efforts.” Moreover, Ellen Willis says: “… in the early ’80s, when feminists used the term political correctness, it was used to refer sarcastically to the anti-pornography movement’s efforts to define a ‘feminist sexuality.’ ”

Some conservative critics claim that political correctness is a Marxist undermining of Western values. William S. Lind and Patrick Buchanan have characterized PC as a technique originated by the Frankfurt School, through what Buchanan describes as “Marxism”. In The Death of the West, Buchanan says: “Political Correctness is Cultural Marxism, a regime to punish dissent and to stigmatize social heresy as the Inquisition punished religious heresy. Its trademark is intolerance.”

Yes, there will be many, many more examples rendered as to why the “elitists” feel the need to alter or otherwise dismantle language. Before we go for now we’d like to establish that, the dollar coin doesn’t change – it is the way people manipulate language that stigmatizes that coin.

(References and sources cited in the preparation of this article are by request, thank you.)

Posted in Abuse of Power, Assessment, Current Events | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

FFQF — America’s Founding Principles

AMERICA’S FOUNDING PRINCIPLES

???What happens to the overall national citizenry and then onward, involving the entire world when a wealthy, innovative, and industrialized nation loses all concepts of the morals and values that were largely responsible for it to aspire to such a world leader?

 Now in the interest of good reading let’s look at some leadership personalities and to what lengths they will go to being popular, in demand, almost a little naughty in order to retain some, or most people they have collected? Some persons will be identified, furthermore, laws albeit by the state or federal government, and we must be real about this by examining a couple of cases and points using the real world.

I certainly do not want to be unruly at this point. However, when one considers the dangerous involvement of the Justice department with its assorted former SEALS, Rangers, and mercenaries for hire, and the organizations they represent are once called on to address a matter, if for some odd reason the operation goes sour then everyone goes into a reflective process.

 “To promote true religion is the best and most effective way of making a virtuous and regular people. Love to God and love to man is the substance of religion; when these prevail, civil laws will have little to do.” –John Witherspoon, Signer of the Declaration of Independence

 Just in recent history the entire compound know as “Waco, Texas” featuring the branch Dividian’s experienced its total demise; Janet Reno was the U. S. Attorney General during the Clinton administration. It is the same Clinton administration that waltzed into office whilst having two or more lawsuits following him (and her) that included a sexual harassment charge brought on when William Clinton was still the Governor of Arkansas; that one was immediately followed by the Jennifer Flowers alleged wrong doings brought forth by the male perpetrator.

Why so 'Honorable"?

Why so ‘Honorable”?

Oh yes the alleged transgressions continued, albeit on a different court docket. It seems as though some parties had brought charges against William and Hillary Clinton in a real estate venture called Whitewater. It was not to long afterward that rumors, gossip, or the truth popped up regarding the President’s affair with Monica Lewinsky, a White House intern.

 “I have sworn upon the alter of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” –Thomas Jefferson

 Similarly now we have leadership holding office in the Obama administration that somehow thinks it is all right to empower Mexican drug cartel by furnishing them with guns, ammo, and money for what? Interestingly, the amount of information that alerted authorities to possible involvement by members of the Obama administration came from inside the agencies.

To go from Fast and Furious quickly to matters relevant to Obama administration members caught up in some “Birth-er scheme” was intense. And I am sure history will one day reveal why it was so important for Obama to lie about an 8 minute video tape that caused civil unrest in Benghazi, Libya. We certainly don’t want to be short on the same matter of events to include crossing the red line in the sand with Syria very much in the same time period that we find that the IRS is spying on and making assessments against those who Obama loathed.

 Just once I will go on record and say that this thought torments me. Imagine in a few years time when being released from all proceedings we have President Obama either in his Memoirs or just for the stink of it manages to say on international television. “Yes the US of America needs several of the current laws thoroughly amended such as, “How does a man rise to the level of the Presidency who legitimately cannot prove where or when he was born; and although experts agree that his birth certificate was indeed a forgery no specific agency put it to the fire. We may find out that Benghazi was a total set up in hatred for the seven or so General officers’ that either quit or were retired by Obama. Moreover, we may find that the IRS scandal was orchestrated by the Justice department for the President.

Physical strength can never permanently withstand the impact of spiritual force.” –Franklin D. Roosevelt

 When one thinks about the morality and values of a nation going downhill one thinks about how Obama and Eric Holder did a stand up gig for Al Sharpton. And then the next day were on the early morning shows with the “how is it that a US Attorney General can go through…”

“Omitting study about religions gives students the impression that religions have not been, and are not now, part of the human experience. Since the purpose of social studies is to provide students with a knowledge of the world…, studying about religions should be an essential part of the social studies curriculum.” –National Council for the Social Studies Study About Religions in the Social Studies Curriculum, Position Statement.
“Public schools may not provide religious instruction, but they may teach about religion, including the Bible or other scripture: the history of religion, comparative religion, the Bible (or other scripture)-as-literature, and the role of religion in the history of the United States and other countries all are permissible public school subjects.” –U. S. Department of Education Legal Guidelines on Religious Expression in Public Schools.
Ultimately, it shows how the Bible and Judeo-Christian thought are arguably the nation’s most significant foundational root and its enduring source of strength. Americans must learn, teach, defend, and preserve the American idea for our families and our nation so that it may endure.

“There is no nation so powerful, as the one that obeys its laws not from principles of fear or reason, but from passion.” –Charles de Montesquieu
“Two things in America are astonishing: the changeableness of most human behavior and the strange stability of certain principles. Men are constantly on the move, but the spirit of humanity seems almost unmoved.” —Alexis de Tocqueville
“The great essential to our happiness and prosperity is that we adhere to the principles upon which the Government was established and insist upon their faithful observance.”–William McKinley

quote_bottom-e1358301882938

Posted in Political Correctness | Leave a comment

Milquetoast, Inappropriate Leadership

Milquetoast, Inappropriate Leadership

Puzzled Confused Lost Signpost Showing Puzzling ProblemAnd we don’t see the world having a problem with where our remarks describe this obscene conflict. We use the word obscene to describe the kind of conflict that is currently happening with ISSI or for Obama’s sake, ISL. And we use the word Milquetoast in our title to give an explanation to how the USA’s leadership is reacting to what our enemy is doing.
Earlier today President Obama called on nations around the world to expand human rights, religious tolerance and peaceful dialogue as they struggle to combat a spate of terrorism that has recently struck places as far afield as Australia, Canada and Europe.

In an address to world leaders on the final day of his summit on violent extremism, Mr. Obama said that poverty and political grievances fuel alienation that can lead to bursts of killing like those seen in Paris, Copenhagen, Sydney and Ottawa. In addition to building up security forces, he said nations must “put an end to the cycle of hate” through opportunity and freedom.
“When people are oppressed and human rights are denied, particularly along sectarian lines or ethnic lines, when dissent is silenced, it feeds violent extremism,” Mr. Obama told a gathering of ministers from dozens of countries. “It creates an environment that is ripe for terrorists to exploit. When peaceful democratic change is impossible, it feeds into the terrorist propaganda that violence is the only answer available.
For us here at The Contemplative Thinker it appears no longer a sense of not knowing the full details in order to disrespect and totally disregard a strategy; subsequently, it is our take here that the Obama Administration is making matters much, so much worse with ISIS, Al Qaeda, all fundamental Islamic groups and we should add Russia into that mix as well.On the run
The president’s remarks came as the summit meeting was wrapping up amid fierce political debate about the administration’s approach to terrorism. More than 13 years after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the United States is still searching for a consensus about how to tackle an enemy more elusive and less structured than the familiar Cold War adversary in Moscow.
Mr. Obama, who has prided himself on ending American involvement in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, has opened a new war in the region by launching airstrikes against the Islamic State, but his critics contend that his strategy is too restrained and his own view of the threat is too limited. Gee, ya’ think!
Barack Obama is showing me how gutless and pacifistic he is when unveiled by his campaigning extremes; the man has no problem lying to the American people; however, with the main-stream media bringing hours of talking heads to the forefront the president is once again lowered to the junior senator he was before becoming the Commander-in-Chief of formally the baddest, arse whooping military industrial complex the world has ever known.

_one color

Posted in Advertising, Civil Rights, Crime, Current Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment