Belmar waitress offered tips from all over USA

I feel as though I want to hate this article — Why? — Because it brings a segment of overwrought political correctness into a place where it just doesn’t belong. Believe me, the way in which this situation is reported by the Asbury Park Press it is enough to make someone cry.

However, I have yet to read anything from any one of the eight persons who were actually at the diner whilst sitting at a table waiting to eat. So with that alone there are a few things I feel responsible about mentioning.

First is the age and gender reference about the establishments staff. Would they ever have printed this story if it were a person attending law school? Or say…a 25 year old male student?

A 20-year-old Rutgers University student who is waiting tables at D’Jais Bar & Grill this summer to help put herself through school, got an unwelcome lesson in the humanities this past week. I see the attention of guilt, remorse, and tragic circumstances in this sentence.

635759523542702774-notipA college student working as a waitress at a Jersey Shore restaurant received no tip on a $112 bill and instead got a taunting message.

Jess Jones explained that she was waiting on a party of eight last week at D’Jais Bar & Grill in Belmar. After the bill was paid for by credit card, Jones saw that her customers had left her no tip.

Let’s sum this event up for our readers — “Tipping is not a place in China” so many signs read. But let’s make one thing perfectly positive here — “To Insure Proper Service,” or what the acronym TIPS is alleged to stand for is not ever something that should be taken for granted just because one works in the service industry. That is the guilt reference.

Instead, they wrote “1 hour for food LOL.” Since when is LOL a taunting message?

Jones, a 20-year-old student at Rutgers University, posted a photo of the receipt and explained the incident on her Facebook page. The photo quickly went viral. (Third reference about age and gender of student.)

Unfortunately something is tragically missing from this story. Most of the time regardless of a wait time to eat people in America realize that the service is a TIP earning business. There is no indication whether or not another part of the staff left these customer’s to believe anything about the wait time.

The Asbury Park Press printed the text of Jones’ post, which has since been deleted:
Forget it…it is unnecessary to post part of a message without giving the customer’s the same right, sorry.

Since the publishing of this article there has been an additional article published by Asbury Park Press. Still no one from the customer’s party has been mentioned or referred too.

_one color

Posted in Journalistic fairness, Political Correctness, Something for Nothing | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Two completely different Issues that make one wonder

Two completely different Issues that make one wonder about the “Truth” told by the U.S. Government

heritage-foundationThis is the sort of drama that occurs when one, a citizen journalist finds out what the real truth is and two, when these truths are made known as common knowledge — by other bigger, more information is gathered, and wealthier organizations such as Politico, The Daily Caller, Town-Hall, even Fox News.com are out there with their mighty resources providing and/or subscribing to the truth of a matter.

Please let it be well-known that this organization uses the aforementioned plus Judicial Watch, The Heritage Foundation, as well as several independent citizen journalist’s to acquire and provide data for proof of allegations made.

I don’t know how many of our readership actually stays up with various mind-boggling events but with what has been and being reported in the last week reminds me of “old journalism” the kind a person went to sleep breathing well.

Today I submit two different stories to you, however brief, but well worth their our writing and hopefully you’ll find them inspiring.

greggutfeldOn “The Five” today, Greg Gutfeld reacted a new video from the Center for Medical Progress that shows Planned Parenthood officials discussing the selling of intact aborted fetuses.

Gutfeld said that the CMP should win a Pulitzer Prize for their work in exposing Planned Parenthood.

“They did what the mainstream media would never do, piercing an iconic organization that media hacks spend careers covering for,” Gutfeld said. “The CMP dedicated years to this project, exposing a ‘service’ that most people never knew existed – because most journalists chose to ignore it. That’s real reporting.”

He said that even Planned Parenthood supporters cannot deny that the CMP’s videos are true bombshells, the kind that would stir the envy of today’s Woodward and Bernstein’s.

We affirm the notion of source-work being further done — why don’t we cut to the chase whilst no-allowing any corporate executive through a litany of attorney’s stop this rubbish from continuing?

082515_an_herridge_640Chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge reported this morning that three government agencies are now confirming that information contained in Hillary Clinton’s private email was classified at the time it was sent.

Herridge said the classified information was in an email three years ago from Clinton aide Huma Abedin to the then-secretary of state, and the messages kickstarted the ongoing FBI probe of Clinton’s email server.

The DIA, the NSA, and the NGA, which oversees U.S. government spy satellites, confirmed to Herridge that the information was classified at the time and remains classified now.

The State Department, along with the Clinton team, have maintained that the information was not classified at the time, with Clinton characterizing the situation as a “disagreement” among agencies about what should be classified.

“That has nothing to do with me,” Clinton said last week in Las Vegas. But how wrong and lying can a person actually be?

Herridge noted that under an Obama executive order from 2009, the State Department cannot decide whether information from other agencies should be classified.

She said only the agency that obtains the information can decide whether to mark it as classified.

Please only once need I write this information out: Given the National Security Act of 1947 it is hereby noted that anyone within a security efficient department of the United States government — from the Department of State to the U.S. Marine Corps., has the responsibility upon receipt of said documentation to with privilege and courtesy determine the documents security standing; furthermore, if information is not classified and is deemed that is should be, then immediate attention should be rendered to said document.

quote_top

Posted in American History, Assessment, Benghazi, Clinton, Crime, Current Events, Disgusting | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Shows Brilliance!

gavelSupreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia reaffirmed his commitment to defending the Constitution while speaking to the Federalist Society in his home state of New Jersey on Friday.

Scalia, the preeminent conservative firebrand of the court, told the audience it is the structure of the government under the Constitution and not the liberties guaranteed under the Bill of Rights that makes us free.

As reported by The Daily Signal: “Every tin horn dictator in the world today, every president for life, has a Bill of Rights,” said Scalia, author of the 2012 book Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. “That’s not what makes us free; if it did, you would rather live in Zimbabwe. But you wouldn’t want to live in most countries in the world that have a Bill of Rights. What has made us free is our Constitution. Think of the word ‘constitution’; it means structure.”bill-of-rights-282x300

Congress passed the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which became known as the Bill of Rights, during the opening months of its first session in 1789, largely following those proposed by the “Father of the Constitution,” James Madison. They were ratified by the states and became the law of the land in 1791.

Scalia argued that without the division of power created by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, which guarantees freedom of speech and religion, the right to bear arms, protection against unlawful search and seizures, and trial by jury of one’s peers among other rights, would just be paper promises with no mechanism to enforce them.

“The genius of the American constitutional system is the dispersal of power,” he said. “Once power is centralized in one person, or one part [of government], a Bill of Rights is just words on paper.” There cannot be any semblance of debate here, there or anywhere. One may try to debate this notion — or even argue for and/or against it. The Bill of Rights is contingent upon first there being a Constitution seeding a government first; or else, what would remain is a government not taking part in the policing of governmental separation of powers.

Scalia stands on firm ground with his observation. James Madison wrote in Federalist 51 that the best bulwark against government tyranny is structuring a system where “ambition must be made to counteract ambition.” As I read this in conjunction with Federalist 51 and what Justice Scalia is referring to is a two-word phrase of “government tyranny.”

James_Madison_140x190He observed: “In…the republic of America, the power surrendered by the people is first divided between two distinct governments [federal and state], and then the portion allotted to each subdivided among distinct and separate departments [legislative, executive, judicial]. Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.”

All things being equal what President James Madison wrote, and I venture to say that this is all predicated upon theory from the great philosophers and an easier means, meaning of course from those that preceded the founding of the United States and subsequently failed.

Scalia noted that the most profound departure from the dispersal-of-power structure established under the Constitution was passage of the ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913, which changed the method of the election of U.S. senators to the popular vote rather than by the state legislatures.

The Founders intended the House of Representatives to be the “people’s house” with elections every two years, while senators served for six-year terms–their constituency being the state legislature. This ensured that senators would have no incentive to trample on the state government’s authority through federal action.

This given to us by first James Madison and reaffirmed by Justice Scalia is a stroke of genius. If one looks at what has become of the U.S. Senate I do not think it is even arguable to understand that those members of government are not showing the esteem of the duly elected State’s legislature.

The Constitution created a federal government with certain enumerated powers, leaving all the remaining authority to the states and the people. Scalia and many other critics believe the federal government has usurped broad authority in powers left primarily to the states.

Okay insofar as this is based on a keynote speaking address given by Justice Scalia he is just about making a mockery of what has become the U.S. Senate and furthermore, leaves no stone unturned when one considers the usurpation of the federal government and what is being from the state’s legislative branch as well as the judiciary.

The “genius stroke” is that Justice Scalia is very much a states oriented person.
“What a difference that makes,” Scalia said. “When you have a bill that says states will not receive federal highway funds unless they raise the drinking age to 21, that bill would not pass. The states that had lower drinking ages would tell their senators, ‘You vote for that and you are out of there.’”

Regarding interpretation of the Constitution overall, Justice Scalia is an originalist. In other words, he believes that it is not up to courts to re-interpret the nation’s governing document, but follow what the Founders’ intended. If the Constitution or laws generally need revision, it is up to the legislative branch to do so.

quote_top

Posted in Politics, Crime, American History, Civil Rights, Corruption, Abuse of Power, Separation of Powers, States' Rights, Congress, U.S. Supreme Court, Democrats | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What kind of “secret deal” has been going on

Emblem_of_the_United_Nations.svg (1)What kind of “secret deal” has been going on…with this Iran Nuke deal? You understand of course, that President Barack Obama having anything to do with it comes as no surprise to me. However, realizing that the “unusual and secret agreement” that involves the United Nations, Iran, and the International Atomic Energy Commission, really has not surprised me.

What I would enjoy being heard on is within this notion of dealing with Iran. Iran’s government has never been one that we could trust. Therefore, why negotiate with them at all? I am pretty sure that our men and women who have been maimed, some even killed by Iranian soldiers, or all of those in The Gulf War could easily tell any of us that we dismissed of the Iraqi’s rather quickly, but it was the mujahedeen and other factions or splinters of Islam that wanted to get involved.

The Associated Press reported Wednesday that, in an unusual and secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work, Iran can use its own experts and equipment in the search for evidence for activities that it has consistently denied — trying to develop nuclear weapons.

downloadAt issue is an investigation of the Parchin nuclear site by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iran has refused access to Parchin for years and denied any interest in — or work on — nuclear weapons.

Based on U.S., Israeli and other intelligence and its own research, the IAEA suspects that the Islamic Republic may have experimented with high-explosive detonators for nuclear arms at that military facility and other weapons-related work elsewhere.

The IAEA has repeatedly cited evidence, based on satellite images, of possible attempts toimages2NI1D3YW sanitize the site since the alleged work stopped more than a decade ago.

A draft document seen by the AP suggests that instead of carrying out their own probe, IAEA staff will be reduced to monitoring Iranian personnel as they inspect the Parchin site.

So right before being hard pressed to get this article published I just passed some of my sources and now they are alleging that officials from the IAEA are now denying any wrong doing whatsoever.

quote_top

Posted in Political Correctness | Leave a comment

President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency

epaHere in Colorado, orange is the new Animas River thanks to the blithering idiots working under President Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency.

It’s just the latest man-caused disaster from an out-of-control bureaucracy whoseepa4 primary mission is not the Earth’s preservation, but self-preservation.

As always, the government cover-up compounds the crime — which is why the agency’s promise this week to investigate itself has residents across the Rocky Mountains in stitches. Or tears.

After the EPA and officials and their contract workers accidentally spilled three million gallons of pent-up toxic sludge on August 5 from a defunct mine in San Juan County that hadn’t operated since 1923, EPA apparatchiks delayed notifying residents for more than 24 hours. They vastly underestimated the volume and spill rate of gunk.

Then, while refusing to release data, EPA head Gina McCarthy flew to the glowing river to fecklessly declare that the water “seems to be restoring itself.”

debtmoneyThe cleanup costs for the Colorado spill alone are estimated at $30 billion. Small farmers, ranchers and tourist-related businesses will be reeling for years to come — yet the EPA is simultaneously pushing forward with Draconian ozone regulations (based on cherry-picked junk science) that will punish the state’s residents with no discernible health benefits.

If only Mother Nature could help wash away the institutionalized corruption that has been leaching from Obama’s EPA headquarters since Day One:

—BP oil spill data doctoring. Former White House Director of the Office of Energy and

Agencies directly under control by the EPA.

Agencies directly under control by the EPA.

Climate Change Policy Carol Browner and the EPA suffered no consequences after they repeatedly lied and cooked the books in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon spill in 2010. Browner, who pulled the puppet strings of then-EPA head Lisa Jackson, misled the public about the scope of the disaster by falsely claiming that 75 percent of the spill was “completely gone from the system.” Then she falsely claimed that the administration’s initial report on the disaster was “peer-reviewed.”

The Interior Department inspector general also singled out Browner for misrepresenting the White House’s blue-ribbon science panel, which opposed a six-month drilling moratorium, and exposed how she butchered their conclusions to justify the administration’s preordained policy agenda.

epa3Browner, an inveterate left-wing crony lobbyist/activist, left office without so much as a wrist slap. Brazen data doctoring and destruction are her fortes. As EPA head during the Clinton administration in the 1990s, she was held in contempt by a federal judge after ordering a staffer to purge and delete her computer files.

Browner had sought to evade a public disclosure lawsuit by conservative lawyer and author Mark Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation.

—Email evasion and transparency trouncing. While Browner was doing her dirty work as Obama’s unaccountable eco-czar, Jackson busied herself creating sock-puppet email personalities to circumvent public disclosure rules as the agency crafted radical climate-change policies in secret. She learned the tricks of the trade from Browner. Jackson admitted to using the pseudonym “Richard Windsor” on one of at least two separate secret government accounts. Competitive Enterprise Institute fellow Christopher Horner discovered the elaborate ruses in 2012. The agency had stonewalled Horner’s FOIA requests on the use of alias accounts at the agency; CEI sued to force the administration to comply.

In December 2012, Jackson resigned amid multiple investigations. Not a wrist slap. Not a scratch. In March of this year, a federal judge blasted the agency for avoiding a separate FOIA request by Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation related to sock-puppet email accounts created by Jackson and others “who may have delayed the release dates for hot-button environmental regulations until after the Nov. 6, 2012, presidential election.”

Apple Computer hired Jackson in 2013 (and all of her multiple personalities). Two months ago, the company proudly announced that it was promoting Jackson to “vice president of Environment, Policy and Social Initiatives” and head of the company’s “global government affairs and public policy teams.”

Double standards. Data destruction. Imposition of radical job-killing regulations. Law-breaking with impunity. Only in Washington does a rogue government agency with an $8 billion budget get away with such serial incompetence and criminality in the name of the “public good.” Protecting the environment has become a full employment racket for green crooks and cronies.

Admittedly I have been waiting for this particular article — concerning the Animas River in Southwestern Colorado, furthermore as written by Michelle Malkin since the catastrophe happened. Ms. Malkin has a true love for the state of Colorado and reported for Fox News live during the heavy fires that plagued the entire area of Colorado Springs. Michelle Malkin is author of the new book “Who Built That: Awe-Inspiring Stories of American Tinkerpreneurs.” Her email address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

pen and parchment

Posted in Abuse of Power, Corruption, Crime, Political Correctness | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Political correctness — How does the actions of Planned Parenthood fill in?

Landowner charged over killing of Cecil the lion

CC15OlA Zimbabwean landowner has been charged with illegally allowing a Minnesota dentist to hunt and kill Cecil the lion last month. Already this near catastrophic event has caused more problems then…Zimbabwean landowner, illegally allowing a Minnesota dentist, hunt and kill Cecil the lion last month.

Honest Ndlovu, who was arrested earlier this month, posted $200 bail Tuesday and is due back in court Sept. 18. He did not enter a plea to allowing “a person who is not ordinarily resident in Zimbabwe to hunt the said animal which was not on the hunting quota,” Reuters reported.

Ndlovu is accused of letting guides lure 13-year-old Cecil from the protected Hwange National Park onto his property, Antoinette Farm. There, using a bow and arrow, Walter Palmer shot and wounded the rare, black-maned lion outfitted with a tracking collar by Oxford University researchers. Palmer and his guides pursued Cecil for nearly two days before finishing him off with a rifle.

Well for certain there doesn’t appear to be much “gamespersonship” involved in Palmer shooting and killing Cecil the lion. Seriously this man paid $55,000 for the luring Cecil to the right place. As for me it must have been an agreement between Oxford University and Palmer regarding the bow and arrow that carried the tracking collar that Cecil wore.

No charges have been filed against Palmer, 55, who paid $55,000 for the hunt. He temporarily closed his dental practice went into hiding after being vilified worldwide for killing the popular Cecil.

The Zimbabwean government has asked U.S. officials to extradite Palmer to face charges. The Associated Press reported that the National Prosecuting Authority said Tuesday that police had not supplied the necessary documents.

One of Palmer’s guides, professional hunter Theo Bronkhorst, faces trial Sept. 28 for failure to prevent an illegal hunt.

Okay now to it — we have within our Nation an organization that sells body parts of unborn children — post abortion or even during a procedure. Admittedly I do not know the age expectancy of a lion such as Cecil; yet, he did have some enjoyable life that he lived, which is so much more that we can say about what Planned Parenthood is doing.

Following the global outcry, Zimbabwe placed strict restrictions on big-game hunting, but AFP reports that most were lifted last week.
pen and parchment

Posted in Corruption, Political Correctness | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Should everyone born in the United States automatically become a citizen?

untitledShould everyone born in the United States automatically become a citizen? It’s a constitutional and political question that probably will get some attention as the current presidential campaign unfolds. But as we shall see, let’s don’t all hold our breath for too long, now.

The birthright citizenship debate was recently brought up in Congress when David Vitter and Steve King introduced legislation that would restrict who is considered a U.S. citizen by birth.

And on Wednesday, GOP candidate Chris Christie told a radio program that he would reconsider qualifications when it came to birthright citizenship. And you understand we expect nothing more from Gov. Christie.

“I think all this stuff needs to be re-examined in light of the current circumstances,” Christie said. “[Birthright citizenship] may have made sense at some point in our history, but right now, we need to re-look at all that.”

One of Christie’s rivals, John Kasich, told CNN this week that he’s reversed his position on birthright citizen, which he wanted to end for illegal immigrants as a member of Congress. “I think we need to get over that. I’m not for it anymore. Let these people who are born here be citizens and that’s the end of it. I don’t want to dwell on it,” he said. What! Well no warm fuzzies here for John Kasich.

The statute proposed by Vitter and King directly tackles a constitutional barrier involving citizenship rights for anyone born in the United States or its incorporated territories.

“It’s astounding that we’re allowing foreign citizens to exploit the loopholes of our immigration system in this manner, and Congress has the obligation to stop it,” Vitter said in a statement that accompanied the legislation in March, which is stalled in Congress. “This practice comes down to a fundamental misunderstanding of the 14th Amendment, and we can stop the massive problem with some simple clarification.”

Specifically, the first sentence of the 14th Amendment reads, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”


Posted in American History, Citizenship, Congress, Crime, Current Events | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How Would You Rate Obama’s Presidency?

obama_immigration-300x180Earlier today I received an email from a person who is trying to assist in finding a legacy for President Obama. As for me, one who has lived and worked by their assessment from others, it really is quite easy for me to grade both terms this man held as president. Moreover, Without further adieu, I will go ahead and identify what this “president” has done to earn the grades assessed by me.

(1) First term: The very first act of legislation approved by Barack Obama was making funds available to other countries for that, “must have abortion.” It took him less than 24 hours to do so — therefore, I am lead to believe that his actions were through “Executive Fiat.” All I really wanted and therefore expected from this junior senator from IL., was basically let’s go along and get along; understanding of course that he maintain some semblance of a status quo. But no — not in a big way! All things being equal this person had members of his own staff lying, colluding, conspiring, as well as fabricating numbers and any other relevant matter, thus refusing to accept blame for anything whatsoever.

Starting from “Funding for other Nation’s Abortions” was immediately followed by members of his own executive branch such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as well as the Department for Alcohol, Drug, Firearms, and Explosive Devices (ATF) that through their counsel began to expose the President and the Attorney General in activities that soon became known as “Fast & Furious.” The ironically sad portion of this of course manifests itself when the ballistics were revealed that some of our own Border agents, ICE members, and ATF agents were in fact, killed with the use of these guns.

51zPiqVuh2L._SL160_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-dp,TopRight,12,-18_SH30_OU01_AA160_(1) Still First Term: Allowing for organizations that openly admitted to breaking the laws such as ACORN and SEIU to continue to not live in a society where the rule of law is considered the fundamentally most important aspect of what a citizen can do. However for the sake of time and reading pleasure it was also during the first term in office that Solandra happened, it was the actual giving away of close to a billion of taxpayer funds; yet, he was otherwise told not to do so by the Justice Department, FBI, and the Attorney General’s office.

It furthermore was within the second year of his presidency when he received a letter from 22-senior Congressional officials requesting meetings with him to go over a proposed plan for immigration; it was also during this time that his uncontrolled amnesty began.

(2) Second term: Although there was enough culpable evidence to suggest (and or prove) voting idiosyncrasies conducted in 48 out of 50 states reporting, this person did absolutely nothing in good faith to investigate allegations.

Worse still was the inadequacy of this politician to ask the people how they felt about the legalization of 10-12 million illegal immigrants situate within the nation. By far one of the most horrific things ever produced by any POTUS within our history involved the “cross the red line theory” which proved to arm up the ISIS regime, allow Iran to go nuts, and back to the cold war with the Russian Federation.

Any real reader of the news or news follower can sort out what has happened in this nation at the reckless disregard of Barack Obama. Shall we bring up the Iran-Scam, the horrendous amount of T.S. “Eyes Only” emails that have circulated the Earth?

(1) First Term: D-
(2) Second Term F-

I do not believe that the hopes and aspirations of the First African American President assisted in furthering the cause of whatever…with the headlines regarding Murder rates, Ferguson, Kansas City, Baltimore, Atlanta, New York, and Cincinnati who is this person leading?

story end 30

Posted in Abuse of Power, Amnesty, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Republican Senators Question Immigration System After Finding 72 Individuals Tied to Terrorism

Republican Senators Question Immigration System After Finding 72 Individuals Tied to Terrorism

Ted Cruz-bobAt the very headline for this article, I did not agree with it being “Republican Senators…” inasmuch as I believe there is far too much emphasis given to the destruction of the two party process we now have. However as I thought about it, and again thought about it, where so many people in this country are extremely oblivious to the promises made by the liberal party with regards to erecting a fence, yet still I wonder where this fence is, or has gone to, this much we can alert you that “No!” there still does not exist at the very least, a fence.

In an effort to learn more about the growing terrorism threat posed by weaknesses in our immigration system, Sens. Ted Cruz and Jeff Sessions have written a letter to DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson, Secretary of State John Kerry, and Attorney General Loretta Lynch, asking for more information regarding the individuals in the U.S. who have ties to terrorism.

“Based on publicly available information, we have identified at least 72 individuals in the United States who, over the last year: have engaged in or attempted to engage in acts of terrorism; conspired or attempted to conspire to provide material support to a terrorist organization; engaged in criminal conduct inspired by terrorist ideology; or who have been sentenced for any of the foregoing,” they wrote. “We would like to understand more about these individuals, and others similarly situated in recent history, and the nexus between terrorism and our immigration system.”

The Washington Examiner has more:


Of the 72 [individuals], 22 were shown to be naturalized citizens. The others were of “unknown” immigrant status or American-born with apparent Arab ties.

 Recent legislative proposals have pushed to expand the naturalization process. Officials added that immigrants from Muslim nations are arriving in huge numbers.

Their letter sought information on all the 72, including their immigration status.

The letter was prompted by a recent hearing with FBI Director James Comey, in which he said that while the agency is “stopping [terror plots] so far through tremendous hard work … it is incredibly difficult.” He further warned that “[he] cannot see [himself] stopping these indefinitely.” One week later, five service members were murdered in a terror attack in Chattanooga.

The worst part is that while 72 people sounds like a fairly large number, we have no way of knowing how many have flown under the radar, and how many more are on their way.

story end 30

Posted in Assessment, Civil unrest, Crime, Illegal Immigration, Terrorist | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Justice Department, F.B.I., ordered Hillary Clinton to surrender Servers

judicialwatch-3Judicial Watch announced that the State Department today submitted to the court an August 8 sworn declaration from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding federal records on her controversial email system. The declaration states:

I, Hillary Rodham Clinton, declare under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct:

1. While I do not know what information may be “responsive” for purposes of this law suit, I have directed that all my e-mails on clintonemail.com in my custody that were or potentially were federal records to be provided to the Department of State, and on information and belief, this has been done.

2. As a result of my directive, approximately 55,000 pages of these emails were produced to the Department on December 5, 2014.

3. Cheryl Mills did not have an account on clintonemail.com. Huma Abedin did have such an account which was used at times for government business.

The document is signed by “Hillary Rodham Clinton.” The State Department was ordered by US District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan on July 31 to request that Clinton and her top aides confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all government records in their possession and to return any other government records immediately. The Court wanted State to ask Clinton, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills to describe their use of Hillary Clinton’s email server to conduct government business. The State Department produced last week the August 5 letter it sent to Mrs. Clinton, which included a copy of Judge Sullivan’s order.

Mrs. Clinton’s declaration fails to comply with both Judge Sullivan’s court order and the State Department’s request. Clinton does not certify she turned over all federal records and provides no information on the extent that Abedin and Mills used her server.

The text of Judge Sullivan’s July 31 minute order:

As agreed by the parties at the July 31, 2015 status hearing, the Government shall produce a copy of the letters sent by the State Department to Mrs. Hillary Clinton, Ms. Huma Abedin and Ms. Cheryl Mills regarding the collection of government records in their possession. These communications shall be posted on the docket forthwith. The Government has also agreed to share with Plaintiff’s counsel the responses sent by Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills. These communications shall also be posted on the docket forthwith.

In addition, as related to Judicial Watch’s FOIA requests in this case, the Government is HEREBY ORDERED to: (1) identify any and all servers, accounts, hard drives, or other devices currently in the possession or control of the State Department or otherwise that may contain responsive information; (2) request that the above named individuals confirm, under penalty of perjury, that they have produced all responsive information that was or is in their possession as a result of their employment at the State Department. If all such information has not yet been produced, the Government shall request the above named individuals produce the information forthwith; and (3) request that the above named individuals describe, under penalty of perjury, the extent to which Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills used Mrs. Clinton’s email server to conduct official government business. The Government shall inform the Court of the status of its compliance with this Order no later than August 7, 2015, including any response received from Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on July 31, 2015.

Judge Emmet Sullivan issued an order late Friday to the State Department explicitly instructing that all federal documents relating to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills be preserved:

In view of [20] the Government’s status report, the Court hereby directs the Government to request that Mrs. Hillary Clinton, Ms. Huma Abedin, and Ms. Cheryl Mills i) not delete any federal documents, electronic or otherwise, in their possession or control, and ii) provide appropriate assurances to the Government that the above-named individuals will not delete any such documents. The Government shall inform the Court of the status of its compliance with this Order no later than August 12, 2015, including a copy of any assurances provided by Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Abedin and Ms. Mills that they will not delete any federal documents in their possession or control. Signed by Judge Emmet G. Sullivan on August 7, 2015.

The order was issued a little over an hour after Judicial Watch lawyers filed an urgent response informing Judge Sullivan of a plan to destroy federal records as reported by State to the court.

The developments come in a Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, the former Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about Hillary Clinton’s email records.

“Mrs. Clinton doesn’t want to tell the whole truth about her email system. I’m a sure the court will have more questions for her,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “This declaration raises more questions than it answers and shows contempt for the court. We will be seeking appropriate relief with the court.”

quote_bottom-e1358301882938

Posted in American History, Assessment, Benghazi, Clinton, Corruption, Crime, Disgusting | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment