This is precisely the stuff (rubbish) I’ve been writing about!

th4TI9Z8LELast evening I had the unmitigated privilege to watch an interview between journalists about how much they can write, or cover a story, and how little the world at large pays any attention to what they are writing about. (Please notice the title in particular the word “rubbish.”) When used by most authors they use it in a cunningly fashion, dispelling what or from where rubbish comes from or means.

Therefore, to set the record straight, “rubbish” originally is translated from the Greek language and carries the connotation of human bowel excrement. It is I believe imperative to understand the apostle Paul’s letter to the Philippian people whereby be readily admits “More than that, I count all things to be loss in view of the surpassing value of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them but rubbish in order that I may gain Christ.” (Phil 3:8 NASB)

President Obama on Wednesday said bluntly that the behaviors described in accusations that the comedian Bill Cosby drugged women for sex would constitute nothing less than rape, and he said the country should have “no tolerance” for such actions.

In his first comments on the decades-old accusations against Mr. Cosby, the president sought to carefully avoid a direct comment on civil legal actions that have been lodged against the longtime comedian and television star by several women in recent years. And he dismissed the idea that he might revoke the Presidential Medal of Freedom conferred on Mr. Cosby by President George W. Bush in 2002.

“There’s no precedent for revoking a medal,” Mr. Obama said in answer to an off-topic question during a long news conference that was otherwise focused on the nuclear deal with Iran announced Tuesday. “We don’t have that mechanism.” Are you sure about that Mr. Obama?

He added that he made it “a policy not to comment” on cases in which legal action wasEric-Holder-jpg pending. Is this to include the Harvard professor, Treyvon Martin, George Zimmerman, the entire cities of Baltimore, Charleston, and Ferguson MO with regards to Michael Brown, the police officers involved, and authorizing the Justice department to do a full scale investigation under the then found guilty of Contempt of Court, USAG Eric Holder?

“I’ll say this,” Mr. Obama said. “If you give a woman or a man, for that matter, without his or her knowledge, a drug, and then have sex with that person without consent, that’s rape.” As if this practice has not been used by other big wigs.

In the deposition, Mr. Cosby, now 77, did not admit to drugging unwitting women, suggesting instead that the women had consented to taking the pills and having sex with him. Even so, some of his accusers have treated the deposition as a vindication of their claims. Mr. Cosby has denied the assault accusations, and he has never faced criminal charges.

His decision to answer the question, and to go further by commenting on the nature of the accusations against Mr. Cosby, suggests that Mr. Obama was eager to lend his voice to the discussion about sexual violence that has arisen from the scandal.

Mr. Obama has often used news conferences to weigh in on topics of intense interest in popular culture. In one of his first news conferences as president, in 2009, he said he thought a white Cambridge police officer was “stupid” to have arrested a black Harvard professor. That comment led to a weeklong furor that ended after Mr. Obama sat down for a “beer summit” with the officer and the professor at the White House. Written with assistance from the New York Times.

pen and parchment

Posted in American History, Assessment, Corruption, Current Events, New Black Panther Party, Political Correctness | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coming of Age in America

Coming of Age in America

Map and Scope_1I am without question certain that when some in this country sees the cliché, “coming of age” their minds normally go down Memory Lane through Summer of ’42, or better still is in the proverbial “birds and bees” stories that get made into films or any public medium that encourages these activities. Heck, there are so many jokes told about coming of age events that the Sears Catalog could still be in wanton demand.

However in the U.S.A. the cliché of coming of age is taking on a completely different role to include using our beloved and smart elected officials and just when we find it — the truth that is — we somehow aren’t feeling that we are at the mercy of this tremendous phenomena. Please allow me the opportunity to suggest a few things then I’ll leave the rest of the matter up to you for a complete analysis.

special-newsRecently in America we have had a gigantic amount of businesses, individuals, and typical, the federal government have been immersed in the enormous amount of premeditated cyber-attacks from various individuals and other countries. Think about it for a reasonable second: the Office of Management recently got stung with something like upwards of four million records of those folks who work for the government. Moreover, it is not only the individuals that own these records that have flimsy reports, but just think about this nugget — in order for those people to be there, on those lists they needed to have a Security Clearance of sorts and to get even the smallest most insignificant clearance is going to take the F.B.I. and other agency personnel investigations to get one okayed for that clearance.

Consider if you will the functions of the businesses that have been hit. Look at only the nation’s infrastructure that is —  being sought are now targeting power grids, water supply systems, and other vital services, threatening our very way of life and international security. Now the businesses with much to lose regarding profitability think, Macy’s, Sears, Wal-Mart, and on and on.

Now then let’s not leave out these — MSM covers up massive cyber attack on America; WSJ, NYSE, United Airlines all under attack. Now any firm or nation that can break these cyber-security codes would have nothing but a breeze when it comes to the US federal government.

The Office of Personnel Management — victim of the attack that was exposed in June — reported on Thursday that “hackers” robbed personal data, including social security numbers and other information of 21.5 million people, according to Efe news agency. The remaining 1.8 million are families of some of the above. In addition to social security numbers, the hackers also accessed addresses, financial and health histories.

Of these, 19.7 million are people who had applied for Jobs in administration or the government and other individuals linked to the public sector, on whom the government ran security checks.

Is this what we refer to as job or occupational security? Seriously other than making the Western hemisphere the victim of Iran, what is this “would be President” trying to do other than call Republican’s names?

Even more importantly than this is the notion behind the ridiculous “One device only” that our then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had to say.

So without getting everything and everyone into an anxiety attack, the people who want to Hillary clintonvote for Hillary Rodham Clinton just may get a real opportunity to thank her for being so well known in China and elsewhere.

The communication that I am trying to portray here is that when people in the highest echelons of government begin or continue to break the law, there will never be accountability or trust again.

pen and parchment

Posted in Ad Nauseum, Amnesty, Citizenship, Clinton, Current Events | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Bogus Central/Federal Government

A Bogus Central/Federal Government

2011-04-27 15.16.54We are currently in the process of capturing a lot of our previous articles and making them available as a tab at the top of this page. As the collection process continues, we would like to humbly put forth an astounding position that we have reluctantly found ourselves in. We can easily recall writing many of our indexed and categorized articles — especially those written over nine years ago that predict or outlay what the consequences will be as long as the United States continued to “protect” illegal immigrants from either deportation, criminal time, or mandating new laws in the name of “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” that allow for some cities, individual states, and various communities to break laws that are already on the books.

When I — as a journalist first began covering this “buddy to buddy” relationship between sanctuary cities and particular departments within the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government is when it finally made an outcome on my life, first as a person and secondly, my perspectives on or about the mental where with all of our elected officials in Washington, D.C.

No longer do I automatically worship the ground on any one of my employees may walk on. Some or most of these congressional legislative law-making clan I would not trust in the care of my beloved hounds. Furthermore, what I ascertained was the jealousy, pettiness, and the proverbial seek one’s own assets first. Here is an example: As it stands right now for the GOP presidential candidates, out of 15 total candidates I think that I would actually vote for perhaps one of them.

Sen. Marco Rubio is not one of them, nor is Sen. Lindsey Graham. They should know why, but just in case, these individual’s involvement (let alone how they voted!) with the Gang of Eight could not have possibly been for anything other than personal gain. And it is a darn good reason I don’t live in any of the San Francisco senatorial/House congressional districts. Why?

Let’s just say that Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Barbara Boxer, and Sen. Dianne Feinstein with their allegiances to organizations such as Code Pink, moreover, giving out rights to stay in our country for we have got to know why.

heritage-foundationMore than 100 convicted criminals who remained in the U.S. despite receiving deportation orders between 2010 and 2014 now face murder charges, according to the agency charged with carrying out such deportations of illegal immigrants.

U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement reports that 121 convicted criminals who were never removed from the country face murder charges today.

In response, Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., of the Judiciary Committee submitted a letter on June 12 requesting a “multi-departmental response” from Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Secretary of State John Kerry and Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson.

In their letter, Grassley and Sessions cite Immigration and Customs Enforcement statistics that show 1,000 of the 36,007 criminally-convicted illegal immigrants released from custody in fiscal year 2013 have been reconvicted of additional crimes.

The senators wrote that the murders committed by the 121 convicted criminals “could have been avoided” had they not been released.

As a result, Grassley and Sessions are requesting an explanation from the Obama administration officials concerning the government’s decision to release the convicted criminals before deportation.

The senators also ask for information concerning the future of U.S. initiatives to deport convicted criminals and whether immigration officials are “fully leveraging existing tools and resources to prevent these dangerous outcomes.”

However, Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Sarah Saldana wrote in a recent letter that convicted criminals may be released, even if the convicted individuals face deportation charges.

In fact, the agency states some individuals who face deportation charges are not requiredDHS to be detained by law.

This primarily manifests itself though the Supreme Court’s ruling in Zadvydas v. Davis, which requires Immigration and Customs Enforcement to release those who are being detained if the deportation does not occur within 180 days.

Of the 121 convicted criminals, 24 were released because Immigration and Customs Enforcement could not deport the criminals within 180 days, as lawfully required. So why release them?

Additionally, Grassley and Sessions’ letter claims that the majority of convicted criminals released due to the Zadvydas v. Davis ruling are from one of 12 countries.

Nearly one-third of these criminals are originally from Cuba. Grassley and Sessions requested a statement from Kerry to delineate actions planned to “incentivize cooperation” with Immigrations and Customs Enforcement’s removal efforts.

Both senators also requested a response from Johnson asking if initiatives including the visa waiver program had been implemented in order to “promote compliance with ICE removal efforts among recalcitrant countries.”

pen and parchment

Posted in Ad Nauseum, Amnesty, Assessment, Citizenship | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

When one thinks of the mainstream media

images (21)When one thinks of the mainstream media in our country it is laughable how many times these alleged “writers, journalists, commentators, news anchors, people of high notoriety and those again with lower values deliberately defraud anyone and everyone who reads, listens, or watches their stories.

It would take much to sit here and write out the false claims that many of these huge name — Dan Rather, Brian Williams, and others — who have misreported stories for their own publicity and certainly for their own financial gain.

Yet, let us look at some of these people and how they have deliberately misreported even what an aspiring person has said — in other words, taken people, positions, and what they’ve held and through laziness and doing a shotty job of not re-listening to an original tape, or even a video, or for whose sake take quality notes especially when one is going to quote someone else.

Recently a reporter completely took what Mr. Donald Trump spoke about and rather than redoing anything, created an extreme load of excrement and before those who have business with Mr. Trump had complied by doing their due-diligence have in the opinion of this writer, become worse for not having done their jobs.

ms13tatoosTrump deplored immigrants from Mexico who “have lots of problems” and are “bringing those problems to us.”

“They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists,” he said, adding, “and some, I assume, are good people.”

Jorge Ramos, a prominent Univision host, called Trump’s remarks “absurd” and “prejudiced.” But is there any truth about what he is saying?

“At Univision, we see first-hand the work ethic, love for family, strong religious values and the important role Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans have had and will continue to have in building the future of our country,” the company said. Again is there any truth to the matter? Of course there is…

There are two lines of text transcribed from the original article at the Washington Post that Mr. Trump proffered, and four plus lines of text (same article) from the prominent Univision host proffered by Jorge Ramos.

However and most importantly — did anyone read, “truth about the matter? Of course there is… Trump is basically using his freedom of speech rights in stating, “deplored immigrants from Mexico ” so other than speaking the gospel truth about his observations what has Mr. Trump done that is wrong.

It absolutely chills me of late (since Washington inside the beltway crowd started it) at how people are demanding apologies2011-04-29 20.25.06 from people who are telling the truth. Did you know that your President Barack Obama, released in one day over 36,000 felony committed criminals from prisons around the nation? Let me think about this one, do you think that maybe out of 36,000 prisoners released, that just maybe some of them had “have lots of problems” and are “bringing those problems to us.” “They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists:” even the reporter from the Washington Post eluded to the “truth to the matter, of course there is…”

Okay I have been able to write the entire truth. But I would be being very remiss if I did not duly warn our reader’s that as long as you are putting up with a former Secretary of State (Hillary Clinton) not telling the truth to otherwise evidence of facts of her lying and misrepresenting the truth, or continue to allow your President Barack Obama to break Constitutional law on a whim because…”he can” focus on the issues people.

Posted in Ad Nauseum, Celebrities, Civil Rights, Clinton, Congress, Costs of Illegal Immigration, Democrats, Disgusting | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A federal judge in Texas has threatened to hold Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson

A federal judge in Texas has threatened to hold Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson and other top immigration Gavel resizedenforcement officials in contempt of court for not fixing problems that led to work permits being mistakenly awarded under President Barack Obama’s executive immigration action after the judge had put the plan on hold.

The Justice Department had said about 2,000 individuals had been sent three-year work authorizations after U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Brownsville, Texas, temporarily blocked the immigration action on Feb. 16.

In a court order Tuesday, Hanen said government officials have yet to fix the problem. The judge also requested Johnson and four other officials attend an Aug. 19 hearing to explain why the issue hasn’t been fixed and to “be prepared to show why he or she should not be held in contempt of court.”

“This court has expressed its willingness to believe that these actions were accidental and not done purposefully to violate this court’s order. Nevertheless, it is shocked and surprised at the cavalier attitude the government has taken with regard to its ‘efforts’ to rectify this situation,” Hanen wrote.

The other officials are: R. Gil Kerlikowske, commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection; Ronald Vitiello, deputy chief of the U.S. Border Patrol; Sarah Saldaña, director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and Leon Rodriguez, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

dhs sealHomeland Security spokeswoman Marsha Catron said in an email her agency and the Justice Department are reviewing Hanen’s order. Justice Department spokesman Patrick Rodenbush declined to comment.

In court documents filed in May, Rodríguez had said his agency had implemented “immediate corrective measures,” including revoking the permits and modifying computer systems to prevent issuing such permits in the future.

Hanen said in his order that if the federal government fixes the problem by July 31, he will cancel the Aug. 19 hearing.

Obama proposed in November expanding a program that protects young immigrants from deportation if they were brought to the U.S. illegally as children and adding another that extends deportation protections to parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents who have been in the country for some years.

He said lack of action by Congress forced him to make sweeping changes to immigration rules on his own, but Republicans said Obama overstepped his authority. (Typical!)

The judge had issued the injunction at the request of a coalition of 26 states, led by Texas, which have filed a lawsuit to stop Obama’s action, saying it is unconstitutional. An appeal of Hanen’s ruling is set to be argued Friday before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.

Hanen has previously criticized the federal government’s actions in the lawsuit, saying the government had been “misleading” after officials revealed that more than 108,000 people had already received three-year reprieves from deportation as well as work permits when the judge had believed that no action would be taken before he issued a ruling on the injunction.

Justice Department attorneys apologized for any confusion regarding the 108,000 reprieves but insisted they were granted under a 2012 program that wasn’t affected by the injunction.

So which is it — on the one part we have a decent judge doing his job for the people; yet, on the other hand we have the Justice Department changing, altering, and furthermore making up rules and laws to deflect this judge’s intentions. This kind of activity by the Justice Department has been going on for years — accordingly it was once upheld because of the famous “Hoover ruling.” However, the bad news now is that there is evidence that every department in the US Federal government is sliding in one way or another.

Allow me please, why do you think the nation has been hit with so many “cyber-attacks” in recent weeks and months? When the group of cyber-attackers gets a whiff that a nation’s National Security Agency is checking and datamining sensitive material; moreover, when the group of cyber-attackers gets certified means that the former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, did not tell the truth regarding her independent servers were nestled in her home somehow doing “charitable work” when in reality she is breaking United States law, breaching everything from National security, opening up highways of encrypted data sources, top secret information, to any predator or largest bidder involved. What do you think is going on?

And now primarily because of these actions, the largest data-mining companies such as Google, Twitter, Facebook, and all the rest are setting their feet down with the Washington elite — or Washington’s white collar criminals.

Along with Texas, the states seeking to block Obama’s action are: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin

byline_ap

Posted in Ad Nauseum, American History, Amnesty, Assessment, Benghazi, Civil Rights, Clinton, Costs of Illegal Immigration, Democrats, Disgusting | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The United States is NOT a place to come and build a new Life~

English“It’s something ironic,” said Ivan Arellano, 29, who is from Mexico and obtained legal status through marriage. He now works as a mason laying the stonework for the lobby floor and walls of what will become the Trump International Hotel.

“The majority of us are Hispanics, many who came illegally,” Arellano said in Spanish. “And we’re all here working very hard to build a better life for our families.”

So here it is — finally…someone with enough sense to admit it. According to Arellano, he makes two very good disclosures about what it is that he and perhaps what illegal immigrants’ have been doing in America since the beginning of time. Arellano states, he obtained legal status through marriage. Well as far as the Democrats are concerned — and I mean they should be feeling shell-shocked about now — murders in their sanctuary cities; what on earth did Obama think he has been creating through his pen and phone?

Moreover with the recent decision from the U.S. Supreme Court, it is very obvious that Critical-Thinking-Concepts-Toolsthose justices did not take the immigration of potential family members into their consideration whatsoever. Now, as it stands, same-sexed entities are eligible for entitlements, where they’re going to live, and everything else that will continue to pull America into the third world.

Furthermore, Arellano states in Spanish that they’re “ALL working very hard to build a better life for our families.” Now then do I have a problem with this? You bet I do! Not to be misunderstood, but please every nominee for candidacy and their respective parties — please take in a bit of wisdom — right here with this attitude is not the factitious less, “Land of Immigrants” that America was originally inhabited by.

You must please understand the truth and facts before you engage your emotionality into the project. This is literally what the original “Gang of Eight” failed to see. It also is failed to be seen by most American’s with our ever-growing bias media reporting.

immigration1The original immigrants came to this country wanting with eagerness to learn the language, customs, and ways of life of those who were around them. They wanted to assimilate. That certainly is one of the largest reasons as to why so many administrations sought to be accommodating to them in their true to form suffrage. Furthermore, these immigrants were also those who went to war first in gratitude at maybe becoming an American. This should be pounded into every Congressional official’s mind given the next immigration reform. People who want good tidings for America, work for those things that will make her a better country — certainly not what the DHS has been doing, i.e., furloughing prisoners, emptying the jail population, and almost allowing good citizens to get hurt.

Interviews with about 15 laborers helping renovate the Old Post Office Pavilion revealed that many of them had crossed the US-Mexico border illegally before they eventually settled in the Washington region to build new lives. The United States is NOT a place to come to build yourself a brand new life. This is precisely what should be made known as a cornerstone of Comprehensive Immigration Reform! Furthermore, we thank those 15 laborers, now we need to check and see if Obama’s new plans like DACA are working.

Where was our law enforcement agencies that we, in fact, have paid for? And they wonder why the average citizen is getting so pissed off.

Now for one nominee for candidacy — Donald Trump. It is alleged that Americans and the hillary_collage_resizedrest of the world are angry with him — whilst at the same time everyone in Washington and literally all over the Nation will not say anything about the law breaking habits of one Mrs. Hillary Clinton and her use of multiple devices on allegedly secure, top secret, heavily encrypted means. Today, just this morning I heard this psychotic woman tell an interviewer that she “did nothing against the law, used only one device, and never had au subpoenaed for anything in her life.”

Now do we want this mentally challenged individual making impromptu decisions about confirmation immigration reform? The gual of politicians!

Posted in Ad Nauseum, American History, Benghazi, Civil Rights, Clinton, Congress, Disgusting, Secretary of State | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Clinton vows to make ‘Comprehensive’ Immigration Reform’ a major Issue

Clinton vows to make ‘Comprehensive’ Immigration Reform

hillary_internDemocratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton spoke to a packed room in the Iowa City Public Library this afternoon, accusing Republicans of proposing a “U-turn” for the country and promising as president she would push for “comprehensive” immigration reform.

In all sincerity, who even wants to read on? Most readers of this column would suggest one of two things: One, knowing that Mr. Jon Paul is an experienced writer, and the potential exists that he could change some rubbish around AND make it interesting and hopefully funny; or Two, forget it, there is nothing that J.P. is going to be able to do whatsoever that will lend humor to this piece of just plain sloppy politics!

Well the consensus states to combine points One and Two and run with it. Sounds good enough to this author.

Of the first part how many of our readers are getting ready to hurl? Spew your guts all overHillary Rodham Clinton the place? And when the writer says, hurl or spew, he is quite openly stating the requested norms of if one spews, then that person should have the control to sort of rearrange the steaming hot mixture in their stomachs that was once breakfast and the light lunch, maybe even the cute little snack eaten much later in the day.

So have at it specifically — let’s to separate all the pieces regardless of shape, size, or condition of the remnants. We feel that this is exactly what the new emphasis entails with Hillary Clinton publically speaking. So on with it…

Think she's got a clue?

Think she’s got a clue?

A partisan press, at the one-time Clinton News Network? So let’s see — My Gaud! Is this what those Clinton wannabe people are expecting to hear? Re-read the opening statement — ” accusing Republicans of proposing a “U-turn” for the country…as well as, as president she would push for “comprehensive” immigration reform.” Sound familiar to anyone?

So familiar that a much younger, glaringly more charismatic, individual from the same DHSparty used these exact words to defraud the entire Nation far too many years ago! And still worse — Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is further away from the problem than ever before. Yet, for those who voted twice for Barack Obama second term is worse than the first.

So whilst we have this untrustworthy female person attacking Republicans and promising to push for a comprehensive reform — nice try Mrs. Clinton, but the facts remain that you are accusing Republicans and promising something “to do” with comprehensive reform. I am positive that if anyone screamed, “How do you plan to do that…” you either didn’t either answer or even field the question.

oversiced b burritoSo for our hurlers and spewer’s the drop cloth is ready for your most colorful inhabitation. So let’s let the breakfast burritos filled with beans, rice, potatoes, and just some meat of choice, sour cream, and all the juices come frothing out — remember now… individual piles for each ingredient.

Stacked high those chunky potatoes, set just aside of the smoldering beef, chicken, or even pork bits, and a different simmering pile for the oozing beans, sour cream and homemade juices just wiggling very gently, and then there is the tortilla that huge burrito is wrapped in with of course our let over rice. It’s a masterpiece!

pen and parchment

Posted in Ad Nauseum, American History, Benghazi | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Essentials of Spending Control

The Essentials of Spending Control

heritage-foundationThis article and discussion points in not meant to be an authoritative point of view. The author makes no claim about his or his staff’s expertise on budgetary controls. However, it is absolutely essential that when new research is discovered or even more emphasis is put toward budgetary controls; consequently, we feel that the topic is one that warrants our attention — literally from the stalwarts of education at every level to some type of program for every American.

This research is based on a hearing that was presented by the Congressional Budget Office and most of the information we can attribute to Heritage Foundation’s expert, Patrick Louis Knudsen and is precisely the kind of activity that should be going on much more broadly and regularly in Congress: budget oversight.

Year after year, Congresses create new programs and expand government activities, but debtmoneyrarely go back to review how those things are working. Consequently, programs that are ineffective, inefficient, bloated, obsolete, or just plain unnecessary gain immortality—while Congress looks the other way. This hearing is a refreshing departure from that pattern, and some of my recommendations today aim at making it a model for other committees—to make a routine of the process you are pursuing today, as one step toward breaking the culture of spending. We believe this goes to the accountability of every congressional member.

First, however, it is necessary to put this discussion in context. While no serious efforts toward reining in government spending should ever be dismissed, the items under consideration are—to be candid—the barest minimum of what Congress should be considering.

Fiscal year 2011 was the third consecutive year with a deficit exceeding $1 trillion. Debt held by the public is roughly three-fourths the size of the entire economy. It cannot be said often enough that three large entitlement programs—Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security—are increasingly dominating both the budget and the economy.

We believe that the process of scouring the budget, line by line, searching for programs that can be struck out or reduced should be standard operating procedure for every administration and every Congress—something like what former Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle called “weeding the garden.” But that is just a fraction of what needs to be done to restore the fiscal health of the federal government.

636_Congress_money2Second, Congress and the President should not ignore tools already available to control and reduce spending. If a President truly wants to cut spending, he or she has a powerful instrument called a veto. It is a broadsword, to be sure, and it can disrupt government activities; but that is exactly why it can be effective. Meanwhile, Congress should apply strong, enforceable caps on all spending—not just discretionary. There is nothing like a firm limit on spending to get rid of waste and force choices among priorities.

There is one thing that is for certain: Unless the current administration as well as the political blundering between the U.S. Supreme Court and the presidency stop, look forward, and have the insight to see America in a bankrupt future, then something needs to be done regarding the current spending on ObamaCare.

pen and parchment

Posted in Ad Nauseum, American History, Assessment, Clinton, Congress, Democrats | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Bewildered Citizen, speaks…!

A Bewildered Citizen, speaks…!

Samuel Adams“The true patriot therefore, will enquire into the causes of the fears and jealousies of his countrymen; and if he finds they are not groundless, he will be far from endeavoring to allay or stifle them: On the contrary, constrained by the Amor Patrai and from public views, he will by all proper means in his power foment and cherish them: He will, as far as he is able, keep the attention of this fellow citizens awake to their grievances; and not suffer them to be at rest, till the causes of their just complaints are removed…Samuel Adams (source: Essay in the Boston Gazette, 1771)

This powerful quote by Samuel Adams, as well as the inspiration from Lt. Col. Allen West Republic.com., that quite openly I had read in my “Reader’s section” that is an absolute must for me to be as impactful as possible, having now stated that I originally was treated to a fabulous article published by the aforementioned Allen West Republic, however in all due fairness I must mention one of my all time favorite sites compiled by Jerry “Mr. B” Broussard, What Did You Say?

For all of us who have not visited his site, the original title of the article was, “20 Items that Americans should be aware of…” which I will readily admit was funny, all the while being very sad, disheartening, bewildering, and true. Therefore, I decided immediately that I would proffer some in my space, albeit, I do have an extraordinary amount to say about these issues, moreover, I can add so much more. But first I would be indebted to everyone who could follow along for some Founder’s quotes. Which of course leads me straight away to Alexander Hamilton’s piece below:

“Some of the consequences of a dissolution of the Union, and the establishment of partial confederacies had been pointed out. He would add another of a most serious nature. Alliances will immediately be formed with different rival and hostile nations of Europe, [or the Middle East] who will foment disturbances among ourselves and make us parties to all their own quarrels. Foreign nations having American dominion are, and must be, jealous of us.  It had been said that respectability in the eyes of foreign nations was not the object at which we aimed; that the proper object of republican government was domestic tranquility and happiness. This was an ideal distinction. No government could give us tranquility and happiness at home which did not possess sufficient stability and strength to make us respectable abroad.” Alexander Hamilton (source: The Federalist Papers, 1787.)

Alex Hamilton 1I think that Mr. Hamilton is actually transcribing what many (or at least 50% of the USA population) may or must have been thinking. But please make no doubt about it whatsoever — Mr. Hamilton is explaining in detail what would happen to this country if we decided to throw up our arms and zealously screaming, “Enough is enough…We’re not going to take it” anymore.

Albeit with our current administration I think that there is plenty of evidence to show that someone named Obama would align with either the enemy he won’t publically identify or the one he currently sees as a vastly growing concern that something should have been dealt with — severely. I cannot help but be reminded of disturbances among ourselves and being deliberately forced into an enemies quarrels. But what indeed is inspiring about Mr. Hamilton is his acknowledgement of what the responsibility and proper object of republican government is — domestic tranquility and happiness.

“The true test of a good government is its aptitude and tendency to produce a good administration…” Alexander Hamilton (source: The Federalist Papers, 1787.)

I truly hope that you are able to see, understand, and feel what it is [common sense] a FFQFgood administration as compared to “whatever administration” Pres. Obama has managed to put together both legally yet more specifically, illegality. The only other question I have is when the Supreme Court or Members of Congress witness the President or anyone for that matter doing something that is clearly against the Constitution, isn’t is incumbent upon them to act?

pen and parchment

Posted in Ad Nauseum, Benghazi, FFQF | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Does Barack Obama have a secret plan to change America?

eagle with flag design on wingsIn addition to our in-depth cover stories and hard-hitting investigative reports, we entertain a constant stream of notable guest commentators including financial analysts, media moguls, political insiders, and more.

Past issues have included incisive commentary from such experts as Dana Perino, Michael Reagan, and Rush Limbaugh — just to name a few.

And with exclusive interviews with political heavyweights including House Speaker John Boehner, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Mike Huckabee, Paul Ryan and Jeb Bush, it’s no wonder The Contemplative Thinker has been described by the Washington Post “a potent force” in American politics.

You need to read The Contemplative Thinker and join more than a half million readers each month who do!

So one of the long-lasting questions that literally is asked almost daily is: Does Barackdivider-in-chief1 - Copy Obama have a secret plan to change America? We as you probably know well, believe that he does.

Furthermore, Dick Morris says he does — a stealth plan that he has already been implementing right under everyone’s noses that will put the Republican Party out of business as a major political force.

Morris, a former presidential adviser and strategist, argues in his just-released book Power Grab: Obama’s Dangerous Plan for a One-Party Nation that America truly is at a crossroads.

Everything that we as American citizens once took for granted, from our civil liberties to our system of checks and balances is now systematically being put into question by Barack Obama and his radical plan.

In this blockbuster book, Morris exposes Obama’s true agenda — to turn America into a banana republic ruled by one party.

For example, Morris reveals how Obama is secretly pushing legislation in different states that would effectively abolish the Electoral College — allowing liberal states to bind all their electoral votes together for the Democratic candidate.

Morris says that already 10 states with 170 electoral votes have signed on to Obama’s law!

With co-author Eileen McGann, Morris has written the most penetrating exposé of the Obama agenda, one that blows the lid off Obama’s secret strategy to downgrade and destroy the Republican Party as a great rival to the Democratic Party.

The "Latte Salute"

The “Latte Salute”

Others have complained of Obama’s executive actions and abuses of power. But Morris goes beyond that to make a convincing case that Obama’s overarching strategy is one that ultimately grabs power from our traditional and bipartisan institutions in favor of a single party: his Democratic Party.

In essence, Obama wants to re-make America along the lines of a modern banana republic, an old-style Mexico where one party ruled by fiat.

According to Morris and McGann, Obama has instituted his plan by:

• Pushing radical immigration plans that will tip the delicate political balance in favor of the Democrats in crucial states and in national elections
• Implementing the biggest power grab of all, ObamaCare — the law that means anything supporters say it does
• Using this new “health” law to help create a permanent government recipient class who will vote Democratic time and again
• Gaining federal control over state-run education systems using the Common Core curriculum
• Asserting more control over private business by granting the EPA global governance in the name of climate change, affecting every aspect of our lives
• Blocking energy independence, thereby slowing economic growth and breeding more Emblem_of_the_United_Nations.svg (1)dependency
• Gutting welfare reform and keeping millions on the dole
• Turning over regulation of the Internet to the United Nations

The authors write: “Obama is a left-wing president who is desperately determined to impose his radical agenda to transform our democratic government and free market economy into his socialist-style ideal before leaving office in 2016. He’s a president who is obsessively fixated on keeping the left in permanent power by turning our two-party system into a one-party monopoly.”

Ben Carson, one of America’s most respected commentators, recently read Dick Morris’ powerful exposé of Barack Obama — “Power Grab: Obama’s Dangerous Plan for a One-Party Nation.”

Here’s what Ben Carson said about “Power Grab”: “I read ‘Power Grab’ and couldn’t put it down. Dick Morris thoroughly reveals President Obama’s hidden agenda.”

He then added: “This book is a must-read for all Americans.”

He is close to achieving his goal, Morris claims.

Only you can stop him.

So for those who believe what most experts are saying; furthermore, have seen and experienced enough of what one man can do, let’s stop him by attacking his amnesty programs, welfare reforms, constant limitless assaults on America’s system of entitlements for starters. Congress needs a backbone that is for certain — therefore, let’s get radical with our paid and that, very nicely employees — the United States Congress.

pen and parchment

Posted in Abuse of Power, Ad Nauseum, Amnesty, Benghazi, Civil Rights, Clinton, Democrats, Disgusting | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment