Why does our President feel as though he’s above the law..?

Please, would someone “in the know” help us understand why as though this president feels as though he’s above the law?

In all of our years experience with scandal, corruption, Watergate, the Pentagon Papers, and the slew of never ending bull squat that comes from that office – why does Barack Obama feel as though he is so BIG he doesn’t have to do what everyone else in this country has to do?

Get this one committed to memory: It took almost three years for Barack “Thin-Skinned” Obama to finally produce this makeshift birth certificate from Hawaii, which is kind of funny to a few of us here…inasmuch as our tenure in Hawaii has seen only spectacular results for requests of birth certificates, for some marriage licenses, and transcripts from various educational institutions. It is not Hawaii, people.

Have you heard of the young man who is lobbying for Obama’s transcripts? We extend our help in anyway possible.

There’s a subpoena from a Georgia administrative court with Barack Obama’s name on it for him to be in Atlanta on Thursday, along with the documentation about his birth, to answer to challenges from residents of the state objecting to the presence of his name on the 2012 ballot.

They believe he’s simply not eligible under the Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.” They say the Founders thought of that status as the offspring of two citizen parents, and Obama’s father was Kenyan. Or they say he wasn’t born in the U.S. They are legitimately allowed to raise those challenges under a state law.

But several observers say no one really should expect Obama to arrive; and at this point we know he has not.

Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural born citizen” is born of parents who are citizens. That argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor v. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.”

That case states: “The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

An extensive analysis of the issue was conducted by Titus, who has taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. He also was the founding dean of the College of Law at Regent University, a trial attorney and special assistant U.S. attorney in the Department of Justice.

“‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning,” he said. “Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”

If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.

“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.” In Michelle Malkin’s words he is from “The Culture of Corruption”

About Jon-Paul

Academia, Constitution, Musicianship, all around Caucasian male, straight, and professes Jesus Christ as the Lord of my life. Guitars -- Classical, Acoustic, A/E, Strat, a real bassist at heart, Les Paul Standard bass.
This entry was posted in Crime, Politics and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to Why does our President feel as though he’s above the law..?

  1. rich sadze says:

    Judge MAHILI ruled on this case, Obama is eligible!


  2. JPotter says:

    Obama finally put in his place!


  3. Pingback: Natural Born Citizen? « THE SURF REPORT

  4. Pingback: Breaking => New Quo Warranto Eligibility Lawsuit Filed Against Obama In Washington, D.C. ~ Demands Return To ‘Rule Of Law’ Under The U.S. Constitution! | Political Vel Craft

  5. Rob says:

    Birthers are fools.


  6. You do know that that Kenya road sign shown in the article was a prank? The little Arabic-looking word under the KENYA is the joke. If you re-arrange the letters front to back, you get the Arabic word for “Hawaii.” The text at the bottom of the sign translates: “Not the birthplace of Barack Obama”. WorldNetDaily debunked this hoax back in February of 2010. Snopes has it too.



    • Jon-Paul says:

      Dr. Conspiracy:

      The use of the sign has little or very little bearing on the article at all. In fact, no where in the article does it state that I, or anyone else affiliated with The Thinker feels, moreover, cares where Obama was born. Therefore, in an attempt to calm down the masses, the photo is used simply for effect (verb); notwithstanding however, that Obama doesn’t have a pot to piss in when it comes down to his eligibility requirements.

      I was over at your site today marveling at how Obama’s lawyers are either adding words or amending current law to accommodate him. As far as we’re concerned, there is far too much evidence to rule him ineligible. The entire notion of “natural born citizens” and the parentage of such, still must be rectified. However and this is what get to us all over here…is that Obama could end all of this by simply proffering the documents in the warrant. What other president in history has with held educational transcripts, proper birth documentation, and do we even have evidence that he attended Columbia University? A little food for thought.



      • rich sadze says:

        “proper birth documentation”
        so 2 forms of BC certifictaes verifed by State of Hawaii, are not proper birth documentation?

        as for Columbia:
        January 2005 Columbia College Today profile of Barack Obama as a Columbia alumnus.

        Columbia College press release from November 2008 identifying him as “the first College alumnus to be elected President of the United States.”

        if you don’t like Obama or his policies, find and support a candidate to oppose him, just decreases your creditablity and aids Obama




        • Jon-Paul says:

          Dear Mr. Sadze:

          In an attempt to be professional and diplomatic one should also be calm, have a sense of tranquility about them, with serene tranquility whilst expressing harmoniously what agenda one may have to espouse what it is precisely that one wants.

          There has either been a terrible mistake on the part of our writers – or – there has been a miscomprehension of the content on your part. In fact, no where in this writing does any writer or staff for The Thinker claim to have a position regarding this issue. This actually was done on purpose insofar as none of us have a position. Upon close examination of the article one should notice that all factual data is done through the use of quotes; therefore, in so doing it may be their position, simply not ours.

          WND reported Friday on the stunning decision from Judge Michael M. Malihi, who refused a demand from Obama’s lawyer to quash the subpoena for Thursday.

          WND had reported earlier when Obama outlined a defense strategy for a number of state-level challenges to his candidacy in 2012 which argue that states have nothing to do with the eligibility of presidential candidates. Such challenges have been raised in New Hampshire, Arizona, Illinois and several other states.
          Judge Malihi, however, took a different view.

          “Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.

          Q: All of this rubbish could have simply been avoided if Barack H. Obama replied in a sufficient manner. Why hasn’t he reciprocated in like fashion?
          Q: What is on his transcripts that would be revealed if he made them part of a record? Financial aid? Claiming untrue issues for entitlements?
          Q: Are you aware that Pres. George Bush made jokes about his grades whilst attending Yale University?
          Q: Are you aware now (obviously not) that those members of the Hawaiian Health Dept. have informed investigators that they acted on orders from others.
          Q: I have four (4) different Certificates of Live Birth, which by any State’s standards is unacceptable.
          Q: I think what continues to lure me in is Barack Obama’s consistent lying, about everything that doesn’t make him a shining knight, the guys is a narcissist.
          Q: What is this person hiding? Given what is approximately 10 years of requests, why doesn’t the guy at least appease the people?

          I am sure you can understand that further correspondence regarding this topic will have to be done by email. In conclusion I thank you in advance and I remain,


          J. William Blake


  7. When you are raised the way he was, and taught what he was taught of course you are going to thin you are above the law. It doesn’t make it right, but being a massive narcissus that Obama is it shouldn’t surprise any of us.

    And besides that, since the man hates this country so much his citizenship should be stripped from him anyways!!!


  8. themadjewess says:

    I am SICK of this pos!


  9. Pingback: Political Vel Craft In Russia’s Pravda: Obama The Chicken Is Being Plucked! | Political Vel Craft

  10. Pingback: (“According to preliminary reports, Judge Malihi issued a default judgment against Obama and will recommend to the Georgia Secretary of State that Obama’s name not appear on the Georgia ballot starting with the March 6th Georgia Democratic primary

  11. Pingback: The Daily Climb-Monday, Jan. 30th, 2012 | The Daily Climb-Daily Posting Of Relevant Content

  12. ehancock says:

    Obama produced his short-form birth certificate, which is actually the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used every year by thousands of people to get their US passports, in 2008–BEFORE THE ELECTION. And the facts on it were confirmed by three Republican and several Democrat officials. Since that was the legal document, that was all that Obama presented for many years, until as a gesture to the birthers, he also produced his long-form Hawaii birth certificate, and showed the physical copies of it to the White House press corps, where everyone had a chance to hold it, examine it and the feel the seal on the back.

    For those of you who still believe that Obama could have been born somewhere else than in Hawaii, a question for you:

    I’ll bet that you know (but may have forgotten) that the US government requires, and has long required, that a child being carried into the USA requires some kind of official travel document to be admitted. This is usually a US passport for the child. Or, it could be the fact that the child is entered on the mother’s US passport. Or, it could be a US visa for the child on a foreign passport. Without one of those, we would not let the child into the country.

    So, IF Obama really had been born in Kenya (or in any country other than the USA), he would have had to have one of those documents–wouldn’t he? His family would have had to show the passport, wouldn’t they? To show the passport, they would have had to have applied for the passport or the visa for Obama. And, if Obama really were born in Kenya (or another country), they would have had to have applied for it in the US consulate or embassy there, wouldn’t they?

    Such applications are FILED by the US government. The documents exist in multiple files, the actual application itself, communication about it with Washington, entries in the passport file, entries in the application file, entries in the places where the child is carried into the USA. The Bush Administration was in charge of the State Department and the INS for eight years before Obama was elected. Don’t you think that they would have checked the claim that he was born outside the USA?

    All they had to do was find one of those files and McCain would win the election.

    Well, they never did. There is no such file.

    So the question is, do you think that the Bush Administration was part of the plot?

    Do you think that the files, the documents, the application for the documents, the communications about the documents were all lost or hidden? Remember, they are in multiple files, the file of the passport holder, the files of applications for passports, the files in the US embassy in foreign countries, the files in the State Department and in the INS (which would have checked in Obama at an entry point if he had actually traveled in 1961)–and yet no document has been found. Why not?

    The absence of the travel document, plus the Hawaii birth certificate, plus the confirmation of the facts on it by three Republican (and several Democrat) officials, plus the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, plus the witness who remembers being told of the birth and writing home about it (to her father, named Stanley, about the unusual event of a birth to a woman named Stanley). All this is evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.


Comments are closed.