Is the Younger the Better Involved is this Decision-Making Process..?
In a cozy cottage decorated with butterflies to symbolize transformation, Katherine Boone was recovering in April from the operation that had changed her, in the most intimate part of her body, from a biological male into a female.
Although at first the procedure did not appear to go well, with Kat really unwanting and nearly unable to move. There was an amount of time that went by where all Kat wanted to do was to hold Emma, she said in her darkened room at the bed-and-breakfast in New Hope, Pa., run by the doctor who performed the operation in a hospital nearby.
Her childlike reaction was, perhaps, not surprising. Kat, whose side-parted hair was dyed a sassy red, is just 18, and about to graduate from high school.
It is a transgender moment. President Obama was hailed just for saying the word “transgender” in his State of the Union address this year, in a list of people who should not be discriminated against. They are characters in popular television shows. Bruce Jenner’s transition from male sex symbol to a comely female named Caitlyn has elevated her back to her public profile as a gold-medal decathlete at the 1976 Summer Olympics.
With growing tolerance, the question is no longer whether gender reassignment is an option but rather how young should it begin. And this is where I readily admit that I have a rather huge problem. The problem is not aligned with the “growing tolerance” but rather the gender reassignment is an option rather and how young should the procedure be started.
Now notwithstanding there seems to be less overall complications with the gender change at younger ages — however, where is the accumulative data that supports “the younger the better?”
Furthermore, if one simply reads and/or reacts on this life changing event as an “option” and then goes through life as happy as a lark why on earth don’t we just start cloning each other?
As for me the biggest problem I have with this notion and ideology is the simple fact that the mainstream media is controlling much of the destiny of what could be the biggest mistake in all times. History is loaded with examples of the iconoclast’s going through bodily change and/or some other sexual schemata that invariably go wrong and something else is altogether created.
I would like to comment on this measure of stupidity: We live under the auspices that humankind is the only animal within the kingdom that will quite openly create a problem for itself with little or no way out. Since when does an earth shattering POTUS begin to accept policy changes whilst all the minions that follow him say he was the first Jewish, Homosexual, Muslim, or Golf Addict president this country has ever known. As open as I can be — if Obama’s for something — I doubt based on his mental integrity if I could be.
Moreover, this person acting as president now is about ready to reel in the worst anti-nuclear foreign policy decision ever made with America’s worst enemies. No Barack Obama certainly does not test his hypothesis’ he just states whatever comes through his big and ugly mouth and then resorts to executive action.