Does Diversity…Think this through

 

Does Diversity Really Unite Us?

ap_barack-obama_ap-photo15-640x469Our progressive politicians and opinion leaders proclaim their commitment to diversity almost daily, chanting the same refrain: “Diversity is our strength.” This is the gospel according to political correctness. But how does diversity strengthen us? Is it a force for unity and cohesiveness? Or is it a source of division and contention? Does it promote the common good and the friendship that rests at the heart of citizenship?

Or does it promote racial and ethnic division and something resembling the tribalism that prevents most of the world from making constitutional government a success? When is the last time we heard anyone in Washington talk about the common good? We are used to hearing talk about the various stakeholders and group interests, but not much about what the nation has in common.                                                                Hillary Clinton (2)_LI

This should not be surprising. Greater diversity means inevitably that we have less in common, and the more we encourage diversity the less we honor the common good. Any honest and clear-sighted observer should be able to see that diversity is a solvent that dissolves the unity and cohesiveness of a nation—and we should not be deceived into believing that its proponents do not understand the full impact of their advocacy! This is what I feel; regardless, of what folks are saying, slandering, or rumor-mill tactics, all one need to do is look at the prior years’ calendar of Supreme Court cases. Furthermore, it would be interesting to look at the lower District Courts calendar as well.

Diversity, of course, marches under the banner of tolerance, but is a bastion of intolerance. It enforces its ideological liberalism with an iron fist that is driven by political correctness, the most ingenious (and insidious) device for suppressing freedom of speech and political dissent ever invented.

Political correctness could have been stopped dead in its tracks over three decades ago, but Republicans refused to kill it when they had the opportunity. In the presidential election campaign of 1980, Ronald Reagan promised to end affirmative action with the stroke of a pen by rescinding the executive order, issued by Lyndon Johnson, that created it. This promise was warmly received by the electorate in that election. But President Reagan failed to deliver his promised repeal. Too many Republicans had become convinced that they could use affirmative action to their advantage—that the largesse associated with racial class entitlements would attract minorities to the Republican Party. By signing on to this regime of political correctness, Republicans were never able to mount an effective opposition to its seemingly irresistible advance.

Today, any Republican charged or implicated with racism—however tendentious, outrageous, implausible, exaggerated, or false the charge or implication may be—will quickly surrender, often preemptively. This applies equally to other violations of political correctness: homophobia, Islamophobia, xenophobia, sexism, and a host of other so-called irrational prejudices. After all, there is no rational defense against an “irrational fear,” which presumably is what the “phobias” are. Republicans have rendered themselves defenseless against political correctness, and the establishment wing of the party doesn’t seem overly concerned, as they frequently join the chorus of Democrats in denouncing Trump’s violations of political correctness. Only President Trump seems undeterred by the tyrannous threat that rests at the core of political correctness. It is important to note the vote.

220px-JohnsonlibertyIn addition to the Affirmative Action Executive Order in 1965, there were other actions taken during the Great Society that were meant to transform America. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sound legislation, authorized by the Fourteenth Amendment and designed to abolish racial discrimination in employment. But the administrative agencies, with the full cooperation of the courts, quickly transformed its laudable goals into mandates that required racial discrimination to achieve racial proportionality in hiring and promotion.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 similarly sought to ban racial discrimination in voting. It too was transmogrified into an act that required racial discrimination in order to achieve proportional results in elections. Proportional results were touted by a palpable fiction as the only reliable evidence of free and fair elections.                   th (2)

The Immigration Act of 1965 was a kind of affirmative action plan to provide remedies for those races or ethnic groups that had been discriminated against in the past. This portion of the original writing is a good excuse however, I lean far more to the left because this type of legislation in in their ideology. Caucasian immigrants from European nations had been given preference in past years; now it was time to diversify the immigrant population by changing the focus to Third World nations, primarily nations in Latin America and Asia. The goal, as some scholars have slowly come to realize, was to diversify the demographic composition of the American population from majority white to a majority of people of color. There was also some anticipation that those coming from these Third World countries were more likely to need the ministrations of the welfare state and therefore more likely to be captured by the Democratic Party, the party promoting the welfare state.

ChgFB8dWYAAlEKU

White middle-class Americans in the 1960s and 70s were often referred to as selfish because their principal interests were improving their own lives, educating their own children, and contributing to their own communities. They showed no inclination to support diversity and the kind of authentic commitment to the new openness that was being advocated by progressive-liberalism. They stood as a constant roadblock to the administrative state, stubbornly resisting higher taxes, increased immigration, and expansion of the welfare state.

Once they were no longer a majority, they would be powerless to resist. Demographers say that sometime around 2040 is the day of reckoning when whites will no longer be a majority and will sometime thereafter have to endure the fate they have inflicted on others for so many years. This radical demographic change will be due almost entirely to the immigration reform that was put into motion by the Immigration Act of 1965.

A special thanks again to Edward J. Erler, who gave this speech at Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Colorado Springs, Colorado in April 2018.There was so much commentated that Ann Coulter’s book, ¡ Adios America! should be mentioned insofar as I paraphrasing used it.

quote_top3

 

Posted in Political Correctness | Leave a comment

Does Diversity Really Unite Us?

Does Diversity Really Unite Us?

Please remember that this is the fourth part of an article. If one should have any difficulty with the vocabulary or understanding the article we encourage everyone to go to each article for a rehash. Time to wake up America!

supreme-court-of-the-united-statesThe dissenting opinion, in this case, would have invalidated the ban on constitutional grounds, based on the idea that the President’s campaign statements and those of his advisers proved that animus against Islam was the real and pervasive motivation for the travel ban.

Had this dissenting opinion prevailed, it would have created an anomaly in constitutional jurisprudence. Conceding that the plain language of the travel ban was neutral and therefore constitutional, what rendered the travel ban unconstitutional was Trump’s purported display of animus in his public speeches. If signed by any president other than Trump, there would, therefore, be no constitutional objections. In other words, in the minds of the dissenters, psychoanalysis of Trump’s motives held greater constitutional significance than the intent of the law expressed in its plain language.

We are asked to believe something incredible: that the American character – is defined only by its unlimited acceptance of diversity. A defined American character – devotion to republican principles, republican virtue, the habits and manners of free citizens, self-reliance – would, in that case, be impermissibly exclusive.

In any case, the majority opinion held that “by its plain language” the Immigration and Naturalization Act “grants the President broad discretion to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. The President lawfully exercised that discretion based on his findings . . . that entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the national interest.” Few limits have ever been placed on the President’s broad authority to act under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, especially when national security and foreign relations are involved.                white house

In the 2016 presidential campaign, Donald Trump appealed to the importance of citizens and borders. In other words, Trump took his stand on behalf of the nation-state and citizenship against the idea of a homogeneous world-state populated by “universal persons.” In appealing directly to the people, Trump succeeded in defeating both political parties, the media, political professionals, pollsters, academics, and the bureaucratic class. All these groups formed part of the bi-partisan cartel that had represented the entrenched interests of the Washington establishment for many years. Although defeated in the election, the cartel has not given up. It is fighting a desperate battle to maintain its power.

The above paragraph is the way that the United States governing policy was designed, keeping the integrity of citizens and borders as a centerpiece during his campaign platform. Furthermore, it is noted that “Trump took his stand on behalf of the nation-state and citizenship against the idea of a homogeneous world-state populated by “universal persons.”

Historically, constitutional government has been found only in the nation-state, where the people share a common good and are dedicated to the same principles and purposes. The homogeneous world-state—the European Union on a global scale—will not be a constitutional democracy; it will be the administration of “universal personhood” without the inconvenience of having to rely on the consent of the governed.

Consequently, Progressive liberalism no longer views self-preservation as a rational goal of the nation-state. Rather, it insists that self-preservation and national security must be subordinate to openness and diversity. America’s immigration policies, we are told, should demonstrate our commitment to diversity because an important part of the American character is openness, and our commitment to diversity is an affirmation of “who we are as Americans.” If this carries a risk to our security, it is a small price to pay. Indeed, the willing assumption of risk adds authenticity to our commitment.

In support of all this, we are asked to believe something incredible: that the American character is defined only by its unlimited acceptance of diversity. A defined American character—devotion to republican principles, republican virtue, the habits and manners of free citizens, self-reliance—would, in that case, be impermissibly exclusive, and thus impermissibly American. The homogeneous world-state recognizes only openness, devotion to diversity, and acceptance as virtues. It must, therefore, condemn exclusivity as its greatest vice. It is the nation-state that insists on exclusive citizenship and immigration policies that impose various kinds of restrictions.

In tomorrow’s article, I will address how and why the importance of The Voting Rights Act 1965, various and quite multi-faceted Immigration acts, and political correctness have assisted in re-shaping America quite a bit different than the way the Founders originally.

Please remember that all of this is easily understandable and put into greater detail in An Open Autopsy on America.                            

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness

Just Irate! No Excuse will ever be accepted!

Just Irate! No Excuse will ever be accepted!

breaking newsThe Iowa college student who vanished more than a month ago has been found dead, according to a report. The 20-year-old’s body was found in Iowa, two law enforcement sources and her father, Rob Tibbetts, told Fox News. No other details were immediately available.

As for me, this was the most confidential investigation performed lately. With law enforcement authorities keeping what they knew silent and close to the chest, most of us wonder if any mainstream media would embark upon rumors, gossip, or even miscommunication as their need for reporting. 180810-mollie-tibbetts-car-feature

However, what has been confirmed by those authorities who conducted the after the fact precision and details, I believe that all the respect that is available goes to them. The 20-year-old’s body was found in Iowa, two law enforcement sources and her father, Rob Tibbetts, told Fox News. No other details were immediately available except those from Greg Willey, vice president of Crime Stoppers of Central Iowa who were as tight-lipped as law enforcement and Fox News.

Most of my current and “follow” readers know just how I feel about illegal immigration. Yet, it does seem as though more and more horrendous crimes are being committed by these individuals. Furthermore, about these politicians and other soothsayers who say that we are deporting only those illegal immigrants with criminal backgrounds are again, wasting our money and our relatives’ lives while trying to look good for their constituents and other voters.

Now all one needs to do is look at the behavior of those in alleged “Sanctuary Cities” as well as various judges in the Federal District Courts. What is it that has gone wrong with these maladjusted freaks?

180802-missing-iowa-teen-sighting-feature1The Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation confirmed in a press release that a body had been found in Poweshiek County, which includes Tibbetts’ town of Brooklyn, Iowa, where she was last seen jogging on July 18.

An “illegal alien” is in custody for the murder of Iowa college student Mollie Tibbetts, according to police officials. Cristhian Rivera, 24, was charged Tuesday in Poweshiek County after being brought in without incident by local cops.

According to officials, Rivera told cops that he saw the young woman running, circled around a few times in his car, and eventually approached her. He got out an ran up behind Tibbetts and accidentally spooked her — causing the 20-year-old to panic, officials said.

Investigators were able to link Rivera to the missing person case after catching his black Chevy Malibu on surveillance camera the day Tibbetts disappeared. He was allegedly tailing her as she ran. “He followed her around,” Rahn said. “Circled around a couple times, located her, then began to interface with her.”  missing_student

Investigators said they got the surveillance video last week and immediately began working to find Rivera. “We were able to track [his car] and the routes in which he took,” Rahn explained. “He was one of the last ones to see Mollie running.” After locating him, cops said they conducted lengthy interviews with Rivera and eventually got him talking.

It’s still unclear how Tibbetts was killed, but authorities expect to find out in the coming weeks as the autopsy wraps up. It’s scheduled to begin on Wednesday. Please join me in prayers for her family, friends, relatives, classmates, and especially Mollie!

Posted in Political Correctness

Socialism, Sociology, and Neo-Marxism

Socialism, Sociology, and Neo-Marxism

earth from apollo 17One of the most significant developments of modern times is the creation of a global economy, affecting work worldwide. The concept of the global economy acknowledges that all dimensions of the economy now cross-national borders, including investment, production, management, markets, labor, information, and technology. Economic events in one nation now can have major reverberations throughout the world. When the economies of any major nation are unstable, the effects are felt worldwide.

Again, as stated in our previous article, “socialism” is an economic system as opposed to a political system. Although, in most instances in order to “make it works” most nations who have elected to use socialism as their own economic system usually affix a name such as “Democratic or Republic plus the name socialist for the simple reason that the leaders would want those in other cultures or societies to acknowledge that they operate a socialist economy in a Democratic political culture. When either identifier – political or economic system – gets so far out of the critical stigmata with nations becoming less Democratic and far less Socialist one issue becomes the variable that affects all people. Here we are referring to Communism.

Also, as mentioned earlier the concept of the global economy acknowledges that all dimensions of the economy now cross-national borders, including investment, production, management, markets, labor, information, and technology.  anna kels from twiter

Now to understand this concept, in reality, is rather utopian in my opinion. Why you ask? If anyone took the courage to think that these dimensions of economic structure are directly related to parts of their own body, such as Investment is now your legs, production equals your arms, management becomes your brain, markets for your feet, labor and information have become your heart, and finally, technology becomes your highest level of critical thinking. I completely dissent to taking parts of a whole human being and upon separation, begin spreading all of your parts to other parts of the world to make it a groupthink type of global supermodel, only available to all.

Nothing like taking sovereignty and throwing it all away. People who proclaim that such a system would work, simply are devoid of simple consciences that would happen in the meantime or interim. For most rational thinkers, the world is in this type of matter right now. Chinese intelligence informing the US CIA that the entire records of anyone who’s ever shopped in a Wal Mart, Dick’s Sporting Goods, Chic-Fil-A food vendor or who may be currently registered with the Social Security Administration (SSA), or anyone who has been “data mined” has all of their personal records stored in China.

Should we even refer to Russian involvement in the voting process of this nation? I am not for any global anything.

th (3)What is happening in the interim around the world is illegal immigration, causes of political correctness, not to mention tariffs and other duties placed on goods bought from elsewhere.

And finally, before launching fully into socialism as an economic system – it is important to note that I have lived in “Social Democracies” throughout my professional life. If there is one way to understand socialism is that NOTHING is for free. Everything is paid for by your paid-in tax.

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness

Sociology, Socialism, and Neo-Marxism

Sociology and Neo-Marxism

When one endeavors into Socialism as a way of government, it is my minimal conclusion that the people who are for such a change, in reality, do not know nearly as much about the tenants of socialism as they should.

494324463 - CopyWithin the social system, there are various subsystems like the political system, economic system, religious system, educational system and others. David Easton and Gabriel Almond played a leading role in developing the system theory in the field of political science. According to Easton, a political system is that system of interactions in any society through which binding or authoritative allocations are made and implemented. Thus, it is making of binding or authoritative an allocation that distinguishes the political system from other systems both within and outside the overall society. Therefore, we would like to say that this is the political side of governance.

Meanwhile, many others have also added in one form or another more into their own definitions of a “political system” such as Max Weber has defined a political system as a human community that successfully claims the monopoly of legitimate use of physical force within a given territory. Almond defines a political system as that system of interactions to be found in all independent societies that perform the functions of integration and adaptation by means of the employment or threat of employment of more or less legitimate physical compulsion.                            antique-blank-camera-269810

Now then, in order to move this article into a meaningful direction, it should be noted that there are extreme differences between political, economic, and other systems that operate within the political system.

For the sake of this writing, it is very important to look at various political systems and to mention their own specific qualities, advantages, and of course, their disadvantages.

It is important to note, however, the emphasis that one needs to place on society – the everyday habits of humankind and how those practices react to and one’s lifestyle. Moreover, it needs to be noted now that various means of governance or the political system interacts with humankind’s economic system.

Yet, for right now we will feature “Socialism” in the West as a means of social reformation; primarily focusing during a time shortly after the Civil War when progress versus poverty, equality, and social thought took center stage in American history.

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness

What a Clusterpuck!

What a Clusterpuck!

-AP_Compound_Search_Children_RemovedA message that people were starving, believed to come from someone inside a makeshift compound in rural northern New Mexico, led to the discovery of 11 children living in filthy conditions.

Taos County Sheriff’s officials said Saturday the children ranging in age from 1 to 15 were removed from the compound in the small community of Amalia — 145 miles (233 kilometers) northeast of Albuquerque and in an isolated high-desert area near the New Mexico-Colorado border. They were then turned over to state child-welfare workers.

For some this may be the appearance of “old news” yet too many a person in New Mexico [Huenigen’s] this is really quite the order of the day. What this article is addressing is what does New Mexican legal jurisprudence have in common with the rest of the United States?  type on fire1

It is important where the compound was found; yet, even more, important on why and by whom this alleged living accommodation came to be known.

Being near the Colorado state border almost gives individuals a free for all on what criminal justice system will be used. Colorado is much different from New Mexico. And the unfathomable conditions these people were living in is enough for me to question the intent on who, what, where, and when these children were being prepared for.

On a more chronological side of this issue, what investigators involved received was the human remains found on a New Mexico compound are that of missing Georgia boy, Abdul-Ghani Wahhaj, authorities confirm. Hogrefe said the condition of the body made it difficult to positively identify the remains, and investigators had to use several means to finally conclude an identity. Right now, there is no confirmation of a cause or a manner of death.

Here comes something that is only true of New Mexico and what that state appears to be living with. Federal District Court Judge Backus on Monday night ruled that three women and a man could be released and tracked with GPS ankle monitors pending their trial on child-abuse charges in connection with the treatment of their 11 kids kept on the site. As of Tuesday evening, two of the women and one of the men remained jailed at the Taos County Detention Center; the third woman is a Haitian native was turned over to ICE agents.

I submit to you with this mini-U.N. type of facility found in a remote outstretch of New Mexico one needs to get a confirmation about what is Congress the American people ready to do with regards to the overly boastful with chests protruding “America, come as you are”? Congress will not do anything except deter legislation and the Office of Professional Responsibility. I am slowly but assuredly finding out that Congress is good for nothing.

ICE1282014_0Although I surrender and will not give up on Common Sense. The social media, email and telephone threats made against Taos District Court Judge Sarah Backus were deemed so serious that court officials felt compelled to reiterate her responsibility to decide on the law, not public opinion based on incomplete information. It remained unclear Tuesday evening whether the Taos, New Mexico, courthouse evacuation was connected to the threats. So learn this-this is what happens when open borders, no USICE, as well as other “Global systems” become the majority of the Democrats agenda.

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness | 1 Comment

Does Diversity Unite Us…? Part III

Does Diversity Unite Us? Part III

Trump hire americanWhen writing, albeit a report for educational purposes, a piece of technical information, writing a manual, or any other journaling the writer of such instance must be aware of the responsibilities and subsequent challenges that arise from one’s own writing.

There is no conceivable way that I am able to make my points [with examples] than to plan accordingly as all responsible writer’s do, or at least those who claim to be good with their subjects.

Moving on to a gentle juxtaposition let’s come to the same criteria and preparation when it comes to our Congressional members. Have you ever imagined, or experienced, or otherwise seen such work completed by our Congressional officials?

As for me, and this is with all the responsibility on me – but have you ever seen such poor operational management as that as displayed by Congress? Just the last time I wrote anything, showed me just how important it is to plan, rewrite, revise, rewrite, and with a little hope and Divine intervention those who sit in Congress may, yet not probably, got it right.th (2)

When studying the US Constitution – and then parlaying that knowledge with what has been added and when it was added, gawd! This stuff is unfathomable. I mean to say in common language is I wonder if anyone who constructs this stuff even considers the people who made be needing it in ten or more years? Prior to me ever going into that realm, I will stop short of The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 that was instantly written by a Senator Edward Kennedy D-MA along with I believe it was the upstart (who could be so stupid, otherwise!) Senator John “War Hero” McCain R-AZ.

After Kennedy’s assassination that November, Congress began debating and would eventually pass the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1965, co-sponsored by Representative Emanuel Celler of New York and Senator Philip Hart of Michigan and heavily supported by the late president’s brother, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts. During Congressional debates, a number of experts testified that little would effectively change under the reformed legislation, and it was seen more as a matter of principle to have a more open policy. Indeed, on signing the act into law in October 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson stated that the act “is not a revolutionary bill. It does not affect the lives of millions…. It will not reshape the structure of our daily lives or add importantly to either our wealth or our power.”

th (1)Federal District Judge in Southern California has discovered a substantive due process right guaranteeing the right to “family integrity” lurking in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and has ordered all children reunited with their illegal immigrant parents. Obviously, the judge expects the parents to be released from incarceration to join their children, but the Trump administration seems determined to keep parents and children together in detention centers until legal proceedings determine their fate.

If I may, how are we told that a “mysterious” due process right guaranteeing the right to “family integrity.” Would it be unreasonable for a citizen to ask, “Whose ‘family integrity’ has been infringed upon here? This is precisely what I mean a simple question asked. Was this due process right actually written for those families who were here or was it written for displaced children? Putting an end to this little clause, yet very conveniently found, needs to be checked.

Just one last exponential comment. Does the American Congress write and therefore pass laws that are as excessively poor as this Immigration Legislation? Secondly, please re-read Part I of this series and please make a determination as to whether you think President Trump’s “animus” was animus indeed or is a guy allowed to say what he wants to say?

quote_top3

 

Posted in Political Correctness

Does Diversity Unite US? (Part II)

Does Diversity Unite US? (Part II)

trump and KenyePart of the complaint against the ban was that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment because Trump had displayed “animus” against Muslims in speeches before and after the 2016 election. The plaintiffs argued that the national security reasons for the ban were merely pretexts for Trump’s thinly disguised contempt for the Muslim religion. Although the Court agreed that individual injury could be alleged under the Establishment Clause, the travel ban on its face was neutral with respect to religion, and it was, therefore, possible to decide the issue on statutory rather than constitutional grounds.

Part of the complaint against the ban was that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment because Trump had displayed “animus” against Muslims in speeches before and after the 2016 election. The plaintiffs argued that the national security reasons for the ban were merely pretexts for Trump’s thinly disguised contempt for the Muslim religion. Although the Court agreed that individual injury could be alleged under the Establishment Clause, the travel ban on its face was neutral with respect to religion, and it was, therefore, possible to decide the issue on statutory rather than constitutional grounds.                                                                                                             type on fire1

The dissenting opinion, in this case, would have invalidated the ban on constitutional grounds, based on the idea that the President’s campaign statements and those of his advisers proved that animus against Islam was the real and pervasive motivation for the travel ban. Had this dissenting opinion prevailed, it would have created an anomaly in constitutional jurisprudence. Conceding that the plain language of the travel ban was neutral and therefore constitutional, what rendered the travel ban unconstitutional was Trump’s purported display of animus in his public speeches. If signed by any president other than Trump, there would, therefore, be no constitutional objections. In other words, in the minds of the dissenters, psychoanalysis of Trump’s motives held greater constitutional significance than the intent of the law expressed in its plain language.

In any case, the majority opinion held that “by its plain language” the Immigration and Naturalization Act “grants the President broad discretion to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States. The President lawfully exercised that discretion based on his findings . . . that entry of the covered aliens would be detrimental to the national interest.” Few limits have ever been placed on the President’s broad authority to act under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, especially when national security and foreign relations are involved.

If forgiven common sense, there has been a matter of quality, or to be a better speaker of English, The US Constitution cannot be, free of argument. Although my intention is that it was purposefully written by the Framers to be that way. My logic comes from every person who ever began to read the document, study the Constitution, or to make sense of it.

Furthermore, I had mentioned that I felt that the Constitution was openly engaged onthe-goooo21 that track of open to debate with the potentiality of argument. I believe that one of the stalwart conventions of this came to bear when a Federal District Judge in Southern California has discovered a substantive due process right guaranteeing the right to “family integrity” lurking in the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and has ordered all children reunited with their illegal immigrant parents. Obviously, the judge expects the parents to be released from incarceration to join their children, but the Trump administration seems determined to keep parents and children together in detention centers until legal proceedings determine their fate.

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness

Does Diversity Really Unite Us?

Does Diversity Really Unite Us?*

eagle1President Trump’s zero-tolerance policy for illegal border crossers has provoked a hysterical reaction from Democrats, establishment Republicans, the progressive-liberal media, Hollywood radicals, and the deep state. What particularly motivated the ire of these Trump-haters was the fact that the zero-tolerance policy would require the separation of parents and children at the border. The hysteria was, of course, completely insincere and fabricated, given that the policy of separating children and parents was nothing new—it had been a policy of the Obama and Bush administrations as well.   eagle with flag design on wings

Furthermore, where is the compassion for the thousands of American children who are separated from their parents every year as a result of arrests and convictions for non-violent crimes? Many of those arrested are single mothers whose infants become wards of the government until their mothers complete their sentences. No hysteria or effusive compassion is elicited by these separations, confirming that the object of the hysteria surrounding illegal border crossers is to force open borders on the nation under the guise of compassion for children.

cropped-eaglewithflagwar-paint

One nation…

President Trump’s preferred solution for ending the influx of illegal immigrants and providing border security is a wall; it is also the preferred solution of the American people. Zero tolerance is an interim policy that—if enforced—will help deter illegal crossers. The hysteria provoked by zero tolerance could have been predicted, but its magnitude and sheer insanity are almost breathtaking. Some prominent constitutional scholars have gone so far as to argue that the government has no constitutional authority to control the border. And this, which seems almost beyond hysteria, from the elite intellectual class that should be most immune to hysteria!

As a sidebar, we wrote on August 2, 2018, I have been asked before, from a different article I wrote stating that some funds were available for wall building. This has come from “However, the definitive version of this bill with amendments, signed into law on December 26, 2007, did not include the removal of funds for the program. Although H.R. 2764 was an appropriation bill and could only cut funds for the lottery during one fiscal year, this was the first time that both the House and the Senate passed a bill to halt the Diversity Visa program H.R. 2764. Number two, our nation, according to the mainstream media has been in the state of hysteria since our honestly handled recruiting system worked in 2016. You see, Albert Gore had won the popular vote in 2000 but the electoral college did not even take into consideration the events in Florida, plus Gore, et.al., lost the hearing in front of the Supreme Court.

More than a century ago, the Supreme Court announced what was considered the settled sense of the matter when it remarked: “It is an accepted maxim of international law . . . 419105_10151238154313092_1906501386_nand essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within [a sovereign nation’s] dominions, or to admit them only in such cases and upon such conditions, as it may see fit to prescribe.” This view was reaffirmed in the recent Supreme Court decision, handed down on June 26, that upheld Trump’s travel ban on foreign nationals from eight countries, six of which have majority Muslim populations.

The majority of this article was produced by a speech given by Edward J. Erler,  co-author of, The Founders on Citizenship and Immigration. The speech was delivered April 11, 2018, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Colorado Springs.

* Not when hysteria, used as an open-border tactic and includes political party individuals.

quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness

Two very quick Titles,1 Political, 1 Illegal immigrant

 

Many in response to yesterday’s blog where what was going to be the real outcome “AImmigration_Separating_Families_66440_jpg-25ddf_c0-65-6000-3935_s620x400

HugeBlue wave or an even bigger Red Wave”? Well depending on those who were endorsed by the President, all five candidates revealed in the victory. 

Starting very early this morning results came in and most organizations didn’t want to be edgy with sporadic elections going round and round and then face change. Seems from most news reports I either read or heard, it was in the blue districts where delays were requested for the mailed in ballots and absentee ballots.

Visa OverstaysCounted as Illegal Immigrants — are sure growing much higher

The nexus of illegal immigration into the U.S. has shifted away from the southwest border and into the country’s air and seaports, where more than 54 million visitors checked in last year — and nearly 630,000 of them didn’t go home, according to new numbers released Monday.

“This report shows that we have a problem with visa overstays in the United States,” a senior administration official said in briefing reporters on the new numbers, vowing to step up enforcement to try to cut down on the violations.

Indeed, more than 98.5 percent of those admitted through airports and seaports departed before their admissions expired in 2016. But the sheer amount of travel — some 54 million visitors who came through those air and seaports — means even that small overstay rate works out to nearly 740,000 illegal immigrants.

Nearly 630,000 immigrants were still in the U.S. at the end of 2016, for a persistent overstay rate of 1.25 percent.

Student visas and exchange visitors were the worst violators, with some countries averaging overstay rates above 20 percent.

Jessica Vaughan, policy studies director at the Center for Immigration Studies, said those kinds of rates should force a rethink at the State Department, which issues visas, and should spur immigration officials to put more effort into deterring and deporting overstays here in the U.S.

“The fact that more than 700,000 visits were overstayed last year shows just how much immigration_visa_overstays_32182_c0-75-2900-1765_s885x516we need to step up interior enforcement to create more of a deterrent, not only by identifying and deporting overstays but by weakening the job magnet by cracking down on employers who hire illegal workers,” she said.

While it’s difficult to know exact numbers, some analysts say that for every illegal immigrant nabbed at the border, another one gets through. That means that fewer than 500,000 new illegal immigrants a year have snuck in.

Oh, how I loathe to be embarrassed by government agencies. At George Mason University, where the college enjoys a robust paper on the desks and pens or pencils being written on while being on the top.

Honestly between the University of  Oregon (undergrad) and George Fox University (Degree converted) then up to George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia for most of my graduate study curriculum.

Well, I love to point out to you that the four institutions I attended were private and old. The University of Portland was the Congregation of Holy Cross Fathers, exactly the same as Norte Dame University, Geo Fox University was directed by The Society of Friends. The George Mason University had its roots in the Methodist doctrines. Yet, there the Theology Department remains near the top for colleges.

PS Most of the agitated migrants is using the mid-1930s and 1940s propaganda by stating something about separating families. As being knowledgeable stewards we must tell them that there is a difference between applying for amnesty programs and assylulm=seeking programs.

 

   quote_top3

Posted in Political Correctness